Cone-Beam CT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer: Evaluation of registration methods and anatomical changes during radiotherapy
Autor: | M. Van der Sangen, M. van Boxtel, A. Van Nunen, P. M. A. van Haaren |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Cone beam computed tomography
medicine.medical_treatment 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging law.invention 0302 clinical medicine law Setup variations OAR Organs at Risk Anatomical changes skin and connective tissue diseases Diaphragm (optics) PET/CT Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography SCC Squamous Cell Carcinoma Oncology (nursing) Health Policy Oesophageal cancer PTV Planning Target Volume Soft tissue lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens TPS Treatment Planning System CTV Clinical Target Volume 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis CBCT Cone Beam Computed Tomography IMRT Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Radiology Cone-Beam CT lcsh:Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine medicine.medical_specialty Setup margins lcsh:R895-920 lcsh:RC254-282 EPID Electronic Portal Imaging Device 03 medical and health sciences Position (vector) Research article medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Care Planning Reduction (orthopedic surgery) Image-guided radiation therapy PET-CT SAL Shrinking Action Level business.industry GTV Gross Tumor Volume equipment and supplies AC Adenocarcinoma EUS Endoscopic UltraSound Radiation therapy IGRT Image Guided RadioTherapy sense organs business Nuclear medicine |
Zdroj: | Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology, Vol 3, Iss C, Pp 30-36 (2017) Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology |
ISSN: | 2405-6324 |
Popis: | Highlights • Different registration methods for position verification of oesophageal cancer. • Clipbox around PTV and vertebrae with soft tissue match was best suited. • Tumour location influences the required setup margins. • A large variety of anatomical changes is revealed when using kV-CBCT. • GTV Reduction and diaphragm position changes were most common anatomical changes. Purpose To evaluate different registration methods, setup margins and number of corrections for CBCT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer and to evaluate anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy treatment. Methods From 50 patients, 440 CBCT-scans were registered automatically using a soft tissue or bone registration algorithm and compared to the clinical match. Moreover, relevant anatomical changes were monitored. A sub-analysis was performed to evaluate if tumour location influenced setup variations. Margin calculation was performed and the number of setup corrections was estimated. Results were compared to a patient group previously treated with MV-EPID based position verification. Results CBCT-based setup variations were smaller than EPID-based setup variations, resulting in smaller setup margins of 5.9 mm (RL), 7.5 mm (CC) and 4.7 mm (AP) versus 6.0 mm, 7.8 mm and 5.5 mm, respectively. A reduction in average number of setup corrections per patient was found from 0.75 to 0.36. From all automatically registered CBCT-scans, a clipbox around PTV and vertebras combined with soft tissue registration resulted in the smallest setup margins of 5.9 mm (RL), 7.7 mm (CC), 4.8 mm (AP) and smallest average number of corrections of 0.38. For distally located tumours, a setup margin of 7.7 mm (CC) was required compared to 5.6 mm for proximal tumours. Reduction of GTV volume, heart volume and change in diaphragm position were observed in 16, 10 and 15 patients, respectively. Conclusions CBCT-based set-up variations are smaller than EPID-based variations and vary according to tumour location. When using kV-CBCT a large variety of anatomical changes is revealed, which cannot be observed with MV-EPID. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |