How is agroforestry perceived in Europe? An assessment of positive and negative aspects by stakeholders

Autor: Staffan Berg, Nina Malignier, Jaconette Mirck, Joana Amaral Paulo, Eric Cirou, Boki Luske, Valerio Bondesan, Sonja Kay, Sandra Novak, Anil Graves, Tania S Oliveira, Yousri Hannachi, Anne Grete Kongsted, Andrea Vityi, João H.N. Palma, Marie Gosme, Mercedes Rois, Rosa Mosquera-Losada, Josep Crous-Duran, Claudine Thenail, Eric Pottier, Silvestre García de Jalón, Jim McAdam, Philippe Van Lerberghe, Paul J. Burgess, Régis Wartelle, Gerardo Moreno, Penka Tsonkova, Anastasia Pantera
Přispěvatelé: Cranfield University, Universidad de Extremadura (UEX), Agri Food and Biosciences Institute, Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), Fourrages Environnement Ruminants Lusignan (FERLUS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Veneto Agricoltura, Crop Production Department, Escuela Politécnica superior, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela [Spain] (USC ), Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Chambre d'agriculture de Charente (CA 16), Chambres d’Agriculture de Bretagne, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment Management, Technological Education Institute of Lamia, Chambre Régionale d'Agriculture de Picardie, Agroscope, Association Française d'Agroforesterie (AFAF), Institut pour le Développement Forestier, Brandenburg University of Technology [Cottbus – Senftenberg] (BTU), European Forest Institute = Institut Européen de la Forêt = Euroopan metsäinstituutti (EFI), Aarhus University [Aarhus], Biodiversité agroécologie et aménagement du paysage (UMR BAGAP), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Ecole supérieure d'Agricultures d'Angers (ESA), Louis Bolk Institute (LBI), Fonctionnement et conduite des systèmes de culture tropicaux et méditerranéens (UMR SYSTEM), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier (CIHEAM-IAMM), Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes (CIHEAM)-Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes (CIHEAM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), University of West-Hungary, European Project: 613520,EC:FP7:KBBE,FP7-KBBE-2013-7-single-stage,AGFORWARD(2014), Universidad de Extremadura - University of Extremadura (UEX), Universidade de Lisboa = University of Lisbon (ULISBOA), Centre National de la Propriété Forestière (CNPF-IDF), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST-Ecole supérieure d'Agricultures d'Angers (ESA), University of Zurich, García de Jalón, Silvestre
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems, Springer Verlag, 2018, 92 (4), pp.829-848. ⟨10.1007/s10457-017-0116-3⟩
Agroforestry Systems, 2018, 92 (4), pp.829-848. ⟨10.1007/s10457-017-0116-3⟩
García de Jalón, S, Burgeaa, P J, Graves, A, Moreno, G, McAdam, J, Pottier, E, Novak, S, Bondesan, V, Mosquera-Losada, R, Crous-Durán, J, Palma, J H N, Paulo, J A, Oliveira, T S, Cirou, E, Hannachi, Y, Pantera, A, Wartelle, R, Kay, S, Malignier, N, Van Lerberghe, P, Tsonkova, P, Mirck, J, Rois, M, Kongsted, A G, Thenail, C, Luske, B, Berg, S, Gosme, M & Vityi, A 2018, ' How is agroforestry perceived in Europe? An assessment of positive and negative aspects by stakeholders ', Agroforestry Systems, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 829–848 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0116-3
ISSN: 1572-9680
0167-4366
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-017-0116-3
Popis: AGAP : équipe CONSYT; International audience; Whilst the benefits of agroforestry are widely recognised in tropical latitudes few studies have assessed how agroforestry is perceived in temperate latitudes. This study evaluates how stakeholders and key actors including farmers, landowners, agricultural advisors, researchers and environmentalists perceive the implementation and expansion of agroforestry in Europe. Meetings were held with 30 stakeholder groups covering different agroforestry systems in 2014 in eleven EU countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom). In total 344 valid responses were received to a questionnaire where stakeholders were asked to rank the positive and negative aspects of implementing agroforestry in their region. Improved biodiversity and wildlife habitats, animal health and welfare, and landscape aesthetics were seen as the main positive aspects of agroforestry. By contrast, increased labour, complexity of work, management costs and administrative burden were seen as the most important negative aspects. Overall, improving the environmental value of agriculture was seen as the main benefit of agroforestry, whilst management and socio-economic issues were seen as the greatest barriers. The great variability in the opportunities and barriers of the systems suggests enhanced adoption of agroforestry across Europe will be most likely to occur with specific initiatives for each type of system.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: