Clinicians’ Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program
| Autor: | Japteg Singh, Seema King, Andrew Lagrotteria, John J. You, Jessica Simon, Gwenn Boryski, Marilyn Swinton, Irene Wai Yan Ma, Rachelle Bernacki, Fiona Dunne |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Critical Care Attitude of Health Personnel Critical Illness Health Personnel media_common.quotation_subject MEDLINE Alberta Documentation Patient-Centered Care medicine Humans Conversation Qualitative Research media_common Ontario Physician-Patient Relations Social work Communication Champion Patient Preference General Medicine Middle Aged Communication Intervention Content analysis Family medicine Practice Guidelines as Topic Female Psychology Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | JAMA Network Open. 4:e2121517 |
| ISSN: | 2574-3805 |
| DOI: | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21517 |
| Popis: | Importance Discussions about goals of care with patients who are seriously ill typically occur infrequently and late in the illness trajectory, are of low quality, and focus narrowly on the patient’s resuscitation preferences (ie, code status), risking provision of care that is inconsistent with patients’ values. The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) is a multifaceted communication intervention that builds capacity for clinicians to have earlier, more frequent, and more person-centered conversations. Objective To explore clinicians’ experiences with the SICP 1 year after implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study was conducted at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Canada. The SICP was implemented at Hamilton General Hospital (Hamilton, Ontario) from March 1, 2017, to January 19, 2018, and at Foothills Medical Centre (Calgary, Alberta) from March 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. A total of 45 clinicians were invited to participate in the study, and 23 clinicians (51.1%) were enrolled and interviewed. Semistructured interviews of clinicians were conducted between August 2018 and May 2019. Content analysis was used to evaluate information obtained from these interviews between May 2019 and May 2020. Exposures The SICP includes clinician training, communication tools, and processes for system change. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinicians’ experiences with and perceptions of the SICP. Results Among 23 clinicians interviewed, 15 (65.2%) were women. The mean (SD) number of years in practice was 14.6 (9.1) at the Hamilton site and 12.0 (6.9) at the Calgary site. Participants included 19 general internists, 3 nurse practitioners, and 1 social worker. The 3 main themes were the ways in which the SICP (1) supported changes in clinician behavior, (2) shifted the focus of goals-of-care conversations beyond discussion of code status, and (3) influenced clinicians personally and professionally. Changes in clinician behavior were supported by having a unit champion, interprofessional engagement, access to copies of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, and documentation in the electronic medical record. Elements of the program, especially the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, shifted the focus of goals-of-care conversations beyond discussion of code status and influenced clinicians on personal and professional levels. Concerns with the program included finding time to have conversations, building transient relationships, and limiting conversation fluidity. Conclusions and Relevance In this qualitative study, hospital clinicians described components of the SICP as supporting changes in their behavior and facilitating meaningful patient interactions that shifted the focus of goals-of-care conversations beyond discussion of code status. The perceived benefits of SICP implementation stimulated uptake within the medical units. These findings suggest that the SICP may prompt hospital culture changes in goals-of-care dialogue with patients and the care of hospitalized patients with serious illness. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|