Prentice's Approach and the Meta-Analytic Paradigm: A Reflection on the Role of Statistics in the Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints

Autor: José Cortiñas Abrahantes, Ziv Shkedy, Fabian Tibaldi, Helena Geys, Didier Renard, Tomasz Burzykowski, Geert Molenberghs, Ariel Alonso, Marc Buyse
Rok vydání: 2004
Předmět:
Zdroj: Biometrics. 60:724-728
ISSN: 0006-341X
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00222.x
Popis: We put a perspective on the strengths and limitations of statistical methods for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints. Whereas using several trials overcomes some of the limitations of a single-trial framework (Prentice, 1989, Statistics in Medicine 8, 431-440), arguably the evaluation of surrogate endpoints can never be done using only statistical evidence but such evidence should be seen as but one component in a decision-making process that involves, among others, a number of clinical and biological considerations. We briefly present a hierarchical framework that incorporates ideas from Prentice's work and is uniformly applicable to different types of surrogate and true clinical outcomes.
Databáze: OpenAIRE