Data documenting the performance of the PT/INR line correction method for reconciling INR discrepancies between central laboratory coagulation analyzers using different thromboplastins during the evaluation of a portable Coagulometer
Autor: | Megan A. Berman, Peggy A. Mann, Wendy S. Baker, Jaime Unabia, Kathleen J. Albright, Heidi Spratt, John R. Petersen |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Multidisciplinary
Correction method business.industry Medicine and Dentistry 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Patient care Measurement site Central laboratory 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis lcsh:R858-859.7 Medicine Research article In patient lcsh:Science (General) Nuclear medicine business Anticoagulation clinic Coagulation analyzers lcsh:Q1-390 |
Zdroj: | Data in Brief, Vol 16, Iss, Pp 312-320 (2018) Data in Brief |
ISSN: | 2352-3409 |
Popis: | The data presented here was produced as part of an evaluation of the performance of the CoaguChek XS point-of-care coagulation analyzer, which is discussed in the research article “POCT PT INR – Is it adequate for Patient Care? A Comparison of the Roche Coaguchek XS vs. Stago Star vs. Siemens BCS in Patients Routinely Seen in an Anticoagulation Clinic” (Baker et al., in press) [1] . An effort to reconcile discrepancies in the patient INR result distributions from different central lab instruments (Stago Star and Siemens BCS) with the PT/INR line method is described (Poller et al., 2010, 2011; Ibrahim et al., 2011) [2] , [3] , [4] . While regression analysis of the ECAA Poller calibrant data provided a linear PT/INR line for all methods, Pearson's chi-squared and one-way repeated measures ANOVA analyses showed that central lab INR measurements continued to exhibit measurement site dependence after the PT/INR line correction was applied. According to paired t-test analysis, only the human thromboplastin dependent methods (CoaguChek XS and Siemens BCS both before and after PT/INR line correction) showed statistically significant agreement (p-value >0.05). |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |