Knowledge to Action: A Challenge for Neck Pain Treatment
| Autor: | Anita R, Gross, Ted, Haines, Charlie H, Goldsmith, Lina, Santaguida, Laurie M, McLaughlin, Paul, Peloso, Stephen, Burnie, Jan, Hoving, Carl, Hildebrand |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2009 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Alternative medicine MEDLINE Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Risk Factors Intervention (counseling) medicine Humans Medical physics Pain Measurement Neck pain Evidence-Based Medicine Neck Pain business.industry General Medicine Evidence-based medicine Exercise Therapy Review Literature as Topic Diagrammatic reasoning Treatment Outcome Systematic review Practice Guidelines as Topic Physical therapy Table (database) medicine.symptom business Algorithms |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 39:351-A6 |
| ISSN: | 1938-1344 0190-6011 |
| DOI: | 10.2519/jospt.2009.2831 |
| Popis: | SYNOPSIS: For clinicians, systematic reviews can enhance incorporation into practice of the large volumes of information emerging from research on effectiveness and risks. But we believe that these reviews are most useful with simplified tools to facilitate translation of this knowledge into practice. We provide a "Neck Care Tool Kit" that gives a diagrammatic approach to prioritizing intervention. The evidence from a series of 11 systematic reviews by the Cervical Overview Group is depicted in decision flow-charts and tables to enhance clinical interpretation of the overview findings. On simple visual inspection of symbols in a table, the reader can establish where there is evidence of benefit or no benefit, the strength of the recommendation, and if these data represent short- or long-term findings. Where possible, we guide clinicians to dosage of specific treatment methods. There is no consensus as to which outcome measures to prioritize among the large number in use. This clinical commentary guides clinicians to view the evidence in enough detail to integrate it into their clinical practice environment. We conclude by delineating research gaps and proposing future research directions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 5 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|