Validation of the INCEPT: A Multisource Feedback Tool for Capturing Different Perspectives on Physicians' Professional Performance
| Autor: | Onyebuchi A. Arah, Kiki M. J. M. H. Lombarts, Alina Smirnova, Cees P. M. van der Vleuten, Benjamin C. M. Boerebach, Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink, Sylvia Heeneman, Mirja W. van der Meulen |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Promovendi SHE, RS: SHE - R1 - Research (OvO), O&O medewerkers SHE, Pathologie, RS: CARIM - R3.06 - The vulnerable plaque: makers and markers, Fysiologie, Onderwijsontw & Onderwijsresearch, Other departments, APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Center for Evidence Based Education, Other Research, APH - Quality of Care |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Male
020205 medical informatics Applied psychology 02 engineering and technology maintenance of certification 0302 clinical medicine Patient-Centered Care Surveys and Questionnaires MEDICAL-EDUCATION 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering multisource feedback 030212 general & internal medicine Reliability (statistics) validation 360-degree feedback Self-management General Medicine Middle Aged Peer assessment peer assessment Respondent RELIABILITY Female Clinical Competence Psychology Social psychology Adult Attitude of Health Personnel accreditation Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] Feedback Education Maintenance of Certification 03 medical and health sciences continuous professional development Cronbach's alpha Physicians Humans Generalizability theory VALIDITY Work Performance DOCTOR PERFORMANCE WORK Self-Management Reproducibility of Results INSTRUMENTS performance improvement physicians' professional performance COLLEAGUE QUESTIONNAIRES multisource feedback/peer assessment PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY ASSESSMENTS Factor Analysis Statistical |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 37(1), 9-18. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS Journal of continuing education in the health professions, 37(1), 9-18. John Wiley and Sons Inc. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 37, 1, pp. 9-18 Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 37, 9-18 |
| ISSN: | 0894-1912 |
| Popis: | Item does not contain fulltext INTRODUCTION: Multisource feedback (MSF) instruments are used to and must feasibly provide reliable and valid data on physicians' performance from multiple perspectives. The "INviting Co-workers to Evaluate Physicians Tool" (INCEPT) is a multisource feedback instrument used to evaluate physicians' professional performance as perceived by peers, residents, and coworkers. In this study, we report on the validity, reliability, and feasibility of the INCEPT. METHODS: The performance of 218 physicians was assessed by 597 peers, 344 residents, and 822 coworkers. Using explorative and confirmatory factor analyses, multilevel regression analyses between narrative and numerical feedback, item-total correlations, interscale correlations, Cronbach's alpha and generalizability analyses, the psychometric qualities, and feasibility of the INCEPT were investigated. RESULTS: For all respondent groups, three factors were identified, although constructed slightly different: "professional attitude," "patient-centeredness," and "organization and (self)-management." Internal consistency was high for all constructs (Cronbach's alpha >/= 0.84 and item-total correlations >/= 0.52). Confirmatory factor analyses indicated acceptable to good fit. Further validity evidence was given by the associations between narrative and numerical feedback. For reliable total INCEPT scores, three peer, two resident and three coworker evaluations were needed; for subscale scores, evaluations of three peers, three residents and three to four coworkers were sufficient. DISCUSSION: The INCEPT instrument provides physicians performance feedback in a valid and reliable way. The number of evaluations to establish reliable scores is achievable in a regular clinical department. When interpreting feedback, physicians should consider that respondent groups' perceptions differ as indicated by the different item clustering per performance factor. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|