False‐positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 in the setting of urgent head and neck surgery and otolaryngologic emergencies during the pandemic: Clinical implications
Autor: | Alyssa M. Civantos, Andrew P. Katz, Zoukaa Sargi, Giovana R. Thomas, Francisco J. Civantos, Elizabeth A. Nicolli, Octavio Martinez, Alexander E. Moskovitz, David M. Andrews, Donald T. Weed, Jason M. Leibowitz |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty RT‐PCR Pneumonia Viral Disease medicine.disease_cause Preoperative care head and neck surgery 03 medical and health sciences Betacoronavirus Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine COVID‐19 Internal medicine Nasopharynx Preoperative Care medicine False positive paradox Humans False Positive Reactions 030212 general & internal medicine Young adult Lung Pandemics Coronavirus preoperative testing Aged 80 and over business.industry Special Issue Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction SARS-CoV-2 pandemic COVID-19 Gold standard (test) Middle Aged Reverse transcriptase Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures Real-time polymerase chain reaction Otorhinolaryngology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Florida RNA Viral Female Emergencies business Coronavirus Infections Tomography X-Ray Computed |
Zdroj: | Head & Neck |
ISSN: | 1097-0347 1043-3074 |
Popis: | Background No reports describe falsepositive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) for novel coronavirus in preoperative screening. Methods Preoperative patients had one or two nasopharyngeal swabs, depending on low or high risk of viral transmission. Positive tests were repeated. Results Forty‐three of 52 patients required two or more preoperative tests. Four (9.3%) had discrepant results (positive/negative). One of these left the coronavirus disease (COVID) unit against medical advice despite an orbital abscess, with unknown true disease status. The remaining 3 of 42 (7.1%) had negative repeat RT‐PCR. Although ultimately considered falsepositives, one was sent to a COVID unit postoperatively and two had urgent surgery delayed. Assuming negative repeat RT‐PCR, clear chest imaging, and lack of subsequent symptoms represent the “gold standard,” RT‐PCR specificity was 0.97. Conclusions If false positives are suspected, we recommend computed tomography (CT) of the chest and repeat RT‐PCR. Validated serum immunoglobulin testing may ultimately prove useful. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |