Evaluation of Validity and Reliability of a Revised Incontinence-Associated Skin Damage Severity Instrument (IASD.D.2) by 3 Groups of Nursing Staff
| Autor: | Jennifer Hurlow, Jean E. Cefalu, Donna Z. Bliss, Kathleen Borchert, Sheila Howes Trammel, Kjerstie Wiltzen, Elise Gannon, Alexandra Gannon, Olga V Gurvich, Haeyeon Lee, Anna Wilhems |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Nursing assessment Validity Nurses Dermatitis Contact Decision Support Techniques Midwestern United States 030207 dermatology & venereal diseases 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Criterion validity Content validity Humans Nursing Assessment Advanced and Specialized Nursing 030504 nursing business.industry Gold standard Reproducibility of Results Middle Aged Community hospital Medical–Surgical Nursing Inter-rater reliability Urinary Incontinence Family medicine Observational study Female 0305 other medical science business Software |
| Zdroj: | Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 45(5) |
| ISSN: | 1528-3976 |
| Popis: | PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate a revised version of the Incontinence-Associated Skin Damage Severity instrument (IASD.D.2) using 3 different groups of nursing staff. Revisions to the instrument included renumbering 1 body area where incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) occurs into 2 areas (right and left), which raised the total possible score from 52 to 56, and defining the borders of the body areas. DESIGN Observational, evaluative design. SAMPLE AND SETTING Five clinical experts certified in wound, ostomy, and/or continence (WOC) nursing evaluated content validity. Evaluators were attendees at the WOC Nurses (WOCN) Society 2014 conference, hospital nurses, and nursing staff at a nursing home. Evaluators were attendees at the WOCN Society's 2014 National Conference, hospital nurses at a community hospital with Magnet designation, and nursing staff at a skilled nursing home in the Midwestern United States. The evaluator group comprised 198 conference attendees (all nurses; age 53 ± 8.2 years, mean ± SD), 67 hospital nurses (age 37 ± 11 years), and 34 nursing home nursing staff (age 45 ±13.8 years). The majority of evaluators (>75%) in each of the groups were female. METHODS Clinical experts evaluated the content validity of the revised instrument. Evaluators scored 5 to 9 photographic cases using the revised instrument. Four of the cases were scored by all evaluators. The agreement of case scores among all evaluators was analyzed to assess interrater reliability. The scores of evaluators grouped by evaluators' self-identified skin color or nursing experience ( |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|