Combining diversification practices to enhance the sustainability of conventional cropping systems
Autor: | Stéphane Cadoux, Loïc Viguier, Sophie Dubois, Rémy Duval, Guénaëlle Corre-Hellou, Nicolas Cavan, Frédérique Angevin, Anne-Laure Toupet de Cordoue, Christian Bockstaller, Olivier Keichinger, Clotilde Toque |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Légumineuses, Ecophysiologie Végétale, Agroécologie (LEVA), Ecole supérieure d'Agricultures d'Angers (ESA)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Unité Impacts Ecologiques des Innovations en Production Végétale (ECO-INNOV), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Laboratoire Agronomie et Environnement (LAE), Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Terres Inovia, ARVALIS - Institut du Végétal [Boigneville], ARVALIS - Institut du végétal [Paris], Institut Technique de la Betterave (ITB), Confédération Générale des Planteurs de Betteraves, ANR-14-CE18-0007,CoSAC,Conception de Stratégies durables de gestion des Adventices dans un contexte de Changement (climat, pratiques agricoles, biodiversité)(2014), European Project: 727482,DiverIMPACTS, Laboratoire Agronomie et Environnement - Antenne Colmar (LAE-Colmar ), Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
Multi-criteria analysis Rotation [SDV.SA.AGRO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agronomy Soil Science Context (language use) Plant Science Diversification (marketing strategy) Multi-criteria analysis DEXiPM Rotation Intercropping Multi-services cover crop Multiple cropping Multi-services cover crop 01 natural sciences DEXiPM Gross margin 12. Responsible consumption Ecosystem services 11. Sustainability Multiple cropping 2. Zero hunger biology business.industry Intercropping 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences 15. Life on land Environmental economics biology.organism_classification Agronomy 13. Climate action Agriculture Sustainability 040103 agronomy & agriculture 0401 agriculture forestry and fisheries Business Agronomy and Crop Science Cropping 010606 plant biology & botany |
Zdroj: | European Journal of Agronomy European Journal of Agronomy, 2021, 127, ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2021.126279⟩ European Journal of Agronomy, 2021, 127, pp.126279-126292. ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2021.126279⟩ |
ISSN: | 1161-0301 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126279 |
Popis: | International audience; A major path helping agriculture achieve the dual challenges of production and environmental preservation, consists of transitioning from the current, external input-based, conventional farming systems to a biodiversity-based agricultural system that rely more on ecosystem services. One lever of this transition consists of diversifying agri-food systems using practices such as rotation extension, intercropping (IC), multiple cropping or multi-services cover crops (MSCC) implementation. Here, we investigated to what extent the combination of diversification practices could contribute to the enhancement of the sustainability of current conventional cropping systems through an ex ante evaluation.We compared the sustainability performances of five diversified (DIV) cropping systems from five major arable crop production regions of France to their local less diversified reference (REF) systems by calculating various criteria and implementing a multi-criteria decision aid model. 76 criteria assessing the three dimensions of sustainability were calculated (10, 17 and 49 criteria for the economic, social and environmental dimensions respectively).Our analysis showed that the combination of diversification practices could improve the environmental performances while maintaining a priori economic and social performances at satisfactory levels according to the local expert working group. The DIV systems always had lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to their REF systems and often improved air and water quality and above- and belowground biodiversity. However, diversification may also cause drawbacks for some indicators, as negative impacts were observed from, gross margin, NO3 lixiviation, NH3 volatilization or pesticide use, in some cases. Our analysis also suggested that the effect of a combination of diversification practices on an indicator can be either positive or negative according to the pedo-climatic context, the level of performance of the reference and compromises in the management of diversification practices in response to local objectives of performance. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |