Myoxanthus affinis Luer 1982
Autor: | Rojas-Alvarado, Gustavo, Blanco, Mario A., Karremans, Adam P. |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: | |
DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.5484770 |
Popis: | 2. Myoxanthus affinis (Lindl.) Luer (1982a: 35). (Fig. 12A–C) Basionym: Pleurothallis affinis Lindley (1836: 354). TYPE:— PERU. Dept. of San Martín: lithophytic, Province of Chachapoyas, 1835, Mathews 1899 (holotype: K!). Homotypic synonym: Humboltia affinis (Lindl.) Kuntze (1891: 667), as “ Humboldtia ”. Heterotypic synonyms: Pleurothallis rigidifolia Reichenbach (1855b: 224). Humboltia rigidifolia (Rchb.f.) Kuntze (1891: 668), as “ Humboldtia ”. TYPE:— PERU. San Martín: lithophytic near Chachapoyas, 1840, Mathews 3187 (holotype: G!). Pleurothallis furfuracea Lehmann & Kraenzlin (1899: 441). TYPE:— ECUADOR. Morona Santiago: Andes east of Sigsig, 1887, Lehmann 6511 (holotype: K!; isotype: AMES!). Distribution:— Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia. Notes:— The illustration of M. affinis in Luer (1992) based on a plant collected in Ecuador is similar to that presented here in Fig. 12A, also from Ecuador. However, the type of M. affinis was collected in Peru. As indicated by Luer and demonstrated by several of his sketches at SEL, this species is highly variable. The material of M. affinis recently described and illustrated from Costa Rica (Rojas-Alvarado & Karremans 2017) is clearly similar to some of Luer’s drawing of this species, but also similar to some of Luer’s drawings of M. dasyllis (all at SEL). Some differences between the diverse material are evident, with specimens from Costa Rica being morphologically more consistent with the type specimen of P. furfuracea than with that M. affinis. It is possible that more than one species is currently treated under the name M. affinis, but with the available information it is impossible to separate these entities. Specimens from the type locality of M. affinis in Peru and M. dasyllis in Ecuador need to be examined carefully, and a thorough study of the variation of this species across its distribution is needed. Published as part of Rojas-Alvarado, Gustavo, Blanco, Mario A. & Karremans, Adam P., 2021, A taxonomic synopsis and morphological characterization of Myoxanthus (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae), pp. 211-258 in Phytotaxa 507 (3) on page 230, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.507.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5425729 {"references":["Luer, C. A. (1982 a) A reevaluation of the genus Myoxanthus (Orchidaceae). Selbyana 7: 34 - 54. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 14425","Lindley, J. (1836) Notes upon some genera and species of American Orchidaceae. Companion to the Botanical Magazine 2: 353 - 357.","Kuntze, O. (1891) Revisio generum plantarum, 2. Felix, Leipzig, 1011 pp.","Reichenbach, H. (1855 b) Symbolae Orchidaceae. Bonplandia 3: 212 - 236.","Kraenzlin, F. W. L. (1899) Orchidaceae Lehmannianae in Guatemala, Costarica [sic], Columbia [sic] et Ecuador collectae, quas determinavit et descripsit. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik 26: 437 - 502.","Luer, C. A. (1992) Icones pleurothallidinarum IX. Systematic of Myoxanthus. Addenda to Platystele, Pleurothallis, subgenus Scopula and Scaphosepalum (Orchidaceae). Monographs in Systematic Botany, Missouri Botanical Garden 44: 1 - 128.","Rojas-Alvarado, G. & Karremans, A. P. (2017) Additions to the Costa Rican Myoxanthus (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae). Lankesteriana 17: 203 - 214. https: // doi. org / 10.15517 / lank. v 17 i 2.29933"]} |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |