Lung retransplant. Experience of a referral centre
| Autor: | Alejandra Libreros Niño, Gabriel Sales Badia, Carlos Ordoñez Ochoa, Sergio Tacoronte Pérez, Alfonso Morcillo A, Sebastián Peñafiel Guzman, Diana Baquero Velandia, Alilis Fontana Bellorín, José Cerón Navarro, Carlos Jordá Aragón, Jose Padilla A |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Graft Rejection
Male medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Risk Factors Internal medicine Medicine Lung transplantation Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Lung Referral and Consultation Retrospective Studies Pulmonary Infarction business.industry Retrospective cohort study Perioperative Respiratory Function Tests Log-rank test medicine.anatomical_structure Referral centre Female business Airway Lung Transplantation |
| Zdroj: | Medicina clinica. 156(1) |
| ISSN: | 1578-8989 |
| Popis: | Background Lung retransplantation (LR) is a valid choice with a significant risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality in selected patients with graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Our goal is to analyse our experience in LR in terms of survival and lung function. Methods Retrospective study of patients undergoing LR (1990–2019). Variables: recipients and procedure, early mortality, survival and lung function in patients with CLAD. Quantitative variables (mean ± SD); qualitative (%). Student's t test or χ2 was used. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier, compared with Log Rank. A p Results Of 784 transplanted patients, 25 patients (mean age 38.41–16.3 years, 12 men and 13 women) were LR; CLAD (n = 19), pulmonary infarction (n = 2), airway complications (n = 2), graft dysfunction (n = 1), hyperacute rejection (n = 1), mean time to retransplantation: 5.41 ± 3.87 years in CLAD and 21.2 ± 21.4 days in non-CLAD. The 90-day mortality was 52% and 36.8% in the second period (p = 0.007), being higher in patients who required preoperative ECMO (80% vs. 20%, p = 0.04). The 1- and 5-year survival was 53.9% and 37.7%, respectively (p = 0.016). Survival of the CLAD group was greater (p = 0.08). Pre LR ECMO decreased survival (p = 0.032). After LR, FEV1 improved an average of 0.98 ± 0.13 L (25.6 ± 18.8%) (p = 0.001). Conclusions LR is a high mortality procedure that requires careful selection of patients with better results in patients with CLAD. The lung function of patients with CLAD improved significantly. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|