Clinical communication in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of the study of clinician–patient dialogue to inform research and practice
| Autor: | Annabelle Lukin, Neda Karimi, Astrid Jane Williams, Alison Rotha Moore, Ria Kanazaki, Susan J. Connor |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
media_common.quotation_subject Scopus Gastroenterology and Hepatology Interpersonal communication PsycINFO social medicine Patient satisfaction inflammatory bowel disease Social medicine Theoretical linguistics medicine Humans media_common business.industry Communication General Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Family medicine Medicine Colitis Ulcerative business qualitative research Diversity (politics) Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 8 (2021) BMJ Open |
| ISSN: | 2044-6055 |
| Popis: | ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to investigate what is currently known about the characteristics of interactions between patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and their clinicians and its effect on patient outcomes.Data sourcesScopus, PubMed, Embase, Communication Abstracts, Health & Society, Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts and PsycINFO were systematically searched from inception to June 2021.Study eligibility criteriaPeer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters in English investigating the characteristics of naturally occurring interactions between clinicians that manage IBD and patients with IBD during recorded consultations were included.Study appraisal and synthesis methodsRisk of bias was assessed using a specifically developed quality assessment tool, grounded in linguistic theory and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis guided by the linguistic concept of metafunction was performed to synthesise the findings.ResultsOf the 2883 abstracts reviewed five formed the basis of the review. Interactions between IBD nurses and patients have been mostly characterised in terms of information provision regarding prescribed medications without consideration of the interpersonal aspect. Discussing online medical information with nurses has been shown to improve patient satisfaction. Analyses of gastroenterologist–patient interactions have concentrated on the clinical relationship which has been shown to be disease-centred. Shared decision making in ulcerative colitis has been shown to be compromised due to lack of transparency regarding treatment goals.LimitationsThis review did not include articles in languages other than English. Cumulative evidence could not be produced due to the small number of included studies and the diversity of contexts, theories and data types.Conclusions and implications of key findingsThere is a paucity of systematic research on naturally occurring clinical communication in IBD and its effect on outcomes. Further research needs to be done to address this knowledge gap.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020169657. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|