Closure of Palatal Fistula with a Local Mucoperiosteal Flap Lined with Buccal Mucosal Graft
| Autor: | A. A. Parsa, D. S. Johnson, M. B. O. M. Honnebier, A. Dorian, F. D. Parsa |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2000 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Fistula medicine.medical_treatment Oral Surgical Procedures Dentistry Surgical Flaps 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Periosteum Nose Diseases medicine Humans Child 030223 otorhinolaryngology Nose Palate business.industry Mouth Mucosa Infant 030206 dentistry Pedicled Flap medicine.disease Mucoperiosteal Flap Surgery Cleft Palate Plastic surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Palatoplasty Otorhinolaryngology Private practice Child Preschool Female Oral Surgery business Oral Fistula |
| Zdroj: | The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 37:127-129 |
| ISSN: | 1545-1569 1055-6656 |
| DOI: | 10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0127_copfwa_2.3.co_2 |
| Popis: | Objective Oro-nasal fistula is a common complication of palatoplasty. Current methods for fistula repair utilize mucoperiosteal flaps or pedicled flaps. These procedures are often cumbersome and leave a raw nasal surface, which may increase the incidence of postoperative risks and problems. In addition, the recurrence rate of the fistula is as high as 34%. We propose a simple two-layer method of fistula repair to avoid recurrences. Design A standard mucoperiosteal flap is raised on the oral side. A buccal mucosal graft is harvested from the cheeks and sutured to the nasal side of the flap that is then inset into the fistula. Setting Patients were either referred to the senior author's private practice (four patients) or were patients who had previously been operated on by the senior author himself (three patients). Subjects Study subjects consisted of seven patients, four males and three females, ages 14 months to 8 years. All patients had previously undergone cleft palate repair, complicated by subsequent oro-nasal fistula formation. Interventions All patients underwent oro-nasal fistula repair under general anesthesia with a local mucoperiosteal flap lined with buccal mucosal grafts placed on the nasal side of the flap. Results In all cases, the fistula was completely closed at first attempt without complications. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years, without evidence of recurrence. Conclusions Our proposed surgical procedure for fistula closure using a standard mucoperiosteal flap lined with a buccal mucosal graft is a suitable alternative for the repair of postpalatoplasty oro-nasal fistulas. Further study and long-term follow-up is needed to establish this method as a new standard form of repair. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|