Clauses abusives et règles de répartition des frais de justice
| Autor: | Sophie Bienenstock, Maxime Charreire |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne (CES), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), EconomiX, Université Paris Nanterre (UPN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
| Jazyk: | francouzština |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Standard form
analyse économique du droit des contrats Unenforceable JEL: K - Law and Economics/K.K1 - Basic Areas of Law/K.K1.K10 - General JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D0 - General/D.D0.D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles Welfare economics Concurrence JEL: K - Law and Economics/K.K4 - Legal Procedure the Legal System and Illegal Behavior/K.K4.K41 - Litigation Process Cournot competition 16. Peace & justice economic analysis of litigation [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance JEL: K - Law and Economics/K.K1 - Basic Areas of Law/K.K1.K13 - Tort Law and Product Liability • Forensic Economics clauses abusives Competition (economics) abusive terms standard form contracts Economics contrats d’adhésion économie des litiges Drafter economic analysis of contracts General Economics Econometrics and Finance JEL: K - Law and Economics/K.K1 - Basic Areas of Law/K.K1.K12 - Contract Law |
| Zdroj: | Revue Economique Revue Economique, 2020, Économie de la résolution des litiges, 71 (3), pp.503-525. ⟨10.3917/reco.713.0503⟩ Revue Economique, Presses de Sciences Po, 2020, Économie de la résolution des litiges, 71 (3), pp.503-525. ⟨10.3917/reco.713.0503⟩ |
| ISSN: | 0035-2764 1950-6694 |
| DOI: | 10.3917/reco.713.0503⟩ |
| Popis: | EnglishAbusive terms and litigation costs allocation Unfair terms have been prohibited by French law in consumer contracts since 1978 and in all standard form contracts since 2016. In both cases, the sanction consists in considering the clause unenforceable. This sanction does not deter the drafter from inserting unfair terms in the contract. We are interested in an alternative sanction, according to which the drafter bears all litigation costs. We build on a standard Cournot model of competition in quantities, in which we add unfair terms as well as the parties’ expenses in litigation costs. We show that the English rule helps to deter the drafter of the contract from inserting unfair terms. francaisLes clauses abusives sont interdites dans les contrats de consommation depuis 1978 et dans l’ensemble des contrats d’adhesion depuis 2016. Dans les deux cas, la sanction consiste a reputer la clause non ecrite. Cette sanction ne permet pas de dissuader le redacteur d’inserer des clauses abusives. Nous nous interessons a une sanction alternative consistant a faire peser sur le redacteur du contrat l’integralite des frais de litige. Nous partons d’un modele standard de concurrence a la Cournot, dans lequel nous integrons des clauses abusives ainsi que les depenses des parties en frais de litige. Nous montrons que la regle anglaise permet de dissuader le redacteur du contrat d’inserer des clauses abusives. Classification JEL : K10, K12, K13, K41, D01. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|