Intranasal Lidocaine in Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Autor: | Murat Pekdemir, Nazire Avcu, Elif Yaka, Latif Erdem Akalın, Serkan Yılmaz, Nurettin Özgür Doğan, Cansu Alyeşil |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Emergency Medical Services Time Factors Metoclopramide Lidocaine Migraine Disorders Severity of Illness Index law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Double-Blind Method Randomized controlled trial Interquartile range law Numeric Rating Scale medicine Humans Prospective Studies Migraine treatment Anesthetics Local Administration Intranasal Pain Measurement business.industry 030208 emergency & critical care medicine medicine.disease Confidence interval Treatment Outcome Migraine Anesthesia Acute Disease Emergency Medicine Antiemetics Female business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Annals of Emergency Medicine. 69:743-751 |
ISSN: | 0196-0644 |
Popis: | Study objective The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal lidocaine administration for migraine treatment. Methods This single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care emergency department. Included patients met the migraine criteria of the International Headache Society. Patients were randomized to intranasal lidocaine or saline solution; all participants received 10 mg of intravenous metoclopramide. Patient pain intensity was assessed with an 11-point numeric rating scale score. The primary outcome measure was the change in pain scores at 15 minutes; secondary outcomes were changes in pain intensity after pain onset and need for rescue medication. Results Patients (n=162) were randomized into 2 groups with similar baseline migraine characteristics and numeric rating scale scores. The median reduction in numeric rating scale score at 15 minutes was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2 to 5) for the lidocaine group and 2 (IQR 1 to 4) for the saline solution group (median difference=1.0; 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 2.1). The reduction in pain score at 30 minutes was 4 (IQR 3 to 7) for the lidocaine group and 5 (IQR 2 to 7) for the saline solution group (median difference=1.0; 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 2.1). Need for rescue medication did not differ between the groups, and local irritation was the most common adverse event in the lidocaine group. Conclusion Although intranasal lidocaine was found no more efficacious than normal saline solution in our study, future studies should focus on patients who present earlier after headache onset. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |