Mobile health app usability and quality rating scales: a systematic review
| Autor: | Antonio Miguel Cruz, Peyman Azad-Khaneghah, Noelannah Neubauer, Lili Liu |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
030506 rehabilitation
Computer science media_common.quotation_subject Biomedical Engineering Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation computer.software_genre 03 medical and health sciences Speech and Hearing 0302 clinical medicine Rating scale Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Quality (business) media_common Multimedia business.industry Rehabilitation Usability Mobile Applications Telemedicine Quality rating 0305 other medical science business Delivery of Health Care computer 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 16:712-721 |
| ISSN: | 1748-3115 1748-3107 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/17483107.2019.1701103 |
| Popis: | To review the rating scales used to evaluate usability and quality of mobile health applications, and to compare their purpose, content, and intended target users (i.e., patients, caregivers, or researchers). We conducted a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the PRISMA statement on Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, IEEE Explore databases, as well as a review of the grey literature to identify rating scales used to evaluate usability and quality of mobile health applications (m-health apps), between January 1, 2000 and July 31, 2018. Two researchers screened the titles and abstracts of articles that met inclusion criteria, and retrieved usability and quality rating scales from the articles. We identified 24 usability scales and 25 quality rating scales in 87 peer-reviewed articles. We identified only one quality rating scale designed for non-expert users (i.e., patients or caregivers). None of the studies used a theoretical framework for app evaluation to support the scales. The validity of existing quality rating scales is yet to be investigated. Existing usability and quality rating scales are targeted at professionals, not end users who are patients or caregivers. Rating scales that are usable by all end-users would make mobile health apps accessible and meaningful to consumers.Implications for rehabilitationThe number of mobile health applications on app stores that can be used for rehabilitation is increasing.Most healthcare providers lack the training to identify m-health apps with high quality to be used in rehabilitation.This study has reviewed the current rating scales that can help clinicians and care providers rate the quality of m-health apps and identify the ones that are most appropriate for their practice. The number of mobile health applications on app stores that can be used for rehabilitation is increasing. Most healthcare providers lack the training to identify m-health apps with high quality to be used in rehabilitation. This study has reviewed the current rating scales that can help clinicians and care providers rate the quality of m-health apps and identify the ones that are most appropriate for their practice. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|