A Protocolised Once a Day Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) Measurement Is an Appropriate Screening Tool for Major Adverse Events in a General Hospital Population

Autor: Jeroen Ludikhuize, Mark H. H. Kramer, Louise S. van Galen, Prabath W. B. Nanayakkara, Casper C. Dijkstra
Přispěvatelé: Internal medicine, ICaR - Circulation and metabolism, AII - Amsterdam institute for Infection and Immunity, ANS - Amsterdam Neuroscience, Anesthesiology
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Male
Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
Medical Doctors
Health Care Providers
Nurses
lcsh:Medicine
Severity of Illness Index
Infographics
0302 clinical medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Status Indicators
Hospital Mortality
Prospective Studies
030212 general & internal medicine
lcsh:Science
Trauma Medicine
education.field_of_study
Multidisciplinary
Mortality rate
Middle Aged
Early warning score
Charts
Hospitals
Professions
Research Design
Female
Risk assessment
Research Article
Computer and Information Sciences
medicine.medical_specialty
Clinical Research Design
Death Rates
Critical Illness
Trauma Surgery
Population
Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
Documentation
Hospitals
General

Research and Analysis Methods
Risk Assessment
03 medical and health sciences
Population Metrics
Severity of illness
medicine
Humans
Intensive care medicine
education
Adverse effect
Aged
Demography
Population Biology
business.industry
Data Visualization
lcsh:R
Biology and Life Sciences
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
Health Care
Mews
Early Diagnosis
Health Care Facilities
People and Places
Emergency medicine
Population Groupings
lcsh:Q
Adverse Events
business
Trauma surgery
Zdroj: PLoS ONE, 11(8). Public Library of Science
PLoS ONE, Vol 11, Iss 8, p e0160811 (2016)
PLoS ONE
van Galen, L S, Dijkstra, C C, Ludikhuize, J, Kramer, M H H & Nanayakkara, P W B 2016, ' A Protocolised Once a Day Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) Measurement Is an Appropriate Screening Tool for Major Adverse Events in a General Hospital Population ', PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. e0160811 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160811
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160811
Popis: BACKGROUND: The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) was developed to timely recognise clinically deteriorating hospitalised patients. However, the ability of the MEWS in predicting serious adverse events (SAEs) in a general hospital population has not been examined prospectively. The aims were to (1) analyse protocol adherence to a MEWS protocol in a real-life setting and (2) to determine the predictive value of protocolised daily MEWS measurement on SAEs: death, cardiac arrests, ICU-admissions and readmissions.METHODS: All adult patients admitted to 6 hospital wards in October and November 2015 were included. MEWS were checked each morning by the research team. For each critical score (MEWS ≥ 3), the clinical staff was inquired about the actions performed. 30-day follow-up for SAEs was performed to compare between patients with and without a critical score.RESULTS: 1053 patients with 3673 vital parameter measurements were included, 200 (19.0%) had a critical score. The protocol adherence was 89.0%. 18.2% of MEWS were calculated wrongly. Patients with critical scores had significant higher rates of unplanned ICU admissions [7.0% vs 1.3%, p < 0.001], in-hospital mortality [6.0% vs 0.8%, p < 0.001], 30-day readmission rates [18.6% vs 10.8%, p < 0.05], and a longer length of stay [15.65 (SD: 15.7 days) vs 6.09 (SD: 6.9), p < 0.001]. Specificity of MEWS related to composite adverse events was 83% with a negative predicting value of 98.1%.CONCLUSIONS: Protocol adherence was high, even though one-third of the critical scores were calculated wrongly. Patients with a MEWS ≥ 3 experienced significantly more adverse events. The negative predictive value of early morning MEWS < 3 was 98.1%, indicating the reliability of this score as a screening tool.
Databáze: OpenAIRE