Comparative study of bone regeneration using fibrin sealant with xenograft in rabbit sinus: pilot study
Autor: | Jae-Min Song, Sang-Hun Shin, Yong-Deok Kim, Won-Hyuk Choi |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Fibrin sealant Maxillary sinus lcsh:Surgery Dentistry Fibrin 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Medicine Bone graft Bone regeneration Sinus (anatomy) Dental alveolus Bone mineral biology business.industry Sealant Research Xenograft 030206 dentistry lcsh:RD1-811 Animal models lcsh:RK1-715 Plastic surgery medicine.anatomical_structure 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis lcsh:Dentistry biology.protein business |
Zdroj: | Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol 43, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021) |
ISSN: | 2288-8586 2288-8101 |
Popis: | Background Stability of the grafted bone volume is one of the important factors to the success of alveolar bone grafts. For this, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or fibrin sealant is mixed with the bone graft material. Bio-Oss® is a protein-free bovine mineral commonly used in bone graft procedures. The grafting particles are commonly combined with a standard fibrin sealant (Tisseel®) to fabricate a plastic implantable product. The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the efficacy of fibrin sealant (Tisseel®) in bone regeneration performance in a rabbit maxillary sinus model. Methods A total of five 3.5 kg weight New Zealand white rabbits were used for the study. After elevating the sinus membrane in both maxillary sinus cavities, Bio-Oss® mixed with normal saline (group 1) was filled into the right side, and Tisseel® mixed Bio-Oss® (group 2) was inserted into the other side. The bone mineral density and bone volume were analyzed with microscopic computed tomography (micro-CT) and histomorphometric 12 weeks after application. Results Histologically, new bone formation rate was 14.8%, and grafted bone rate was 70.5% in group 1. In group 2, they were 18.5% and 60.4%, respectively. According to micro-CT analysis, bone mineral density (mg/cm3, BMD) was 2.5% larger in group 1. Conclusions The findings from this study suggest that, although the difference in the bone formation between group 1 and group 2 appears to be insignificant, group 2 had an advantage in using smaller amount of bone substances to achieve the reliable bone formation. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |