National Awards and Female Emergency Physicians in the United States: Is the 'Recognition Gap' Closing?
| Autor: | Esther K. Choo, Andrea Fang, Amy J. Zeidan, Kinjal N. Sethuraman, Sharon Chekijian |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Gender equity business.industry media_common.quotation_subject education Closing (real estate) Awards and Prizes Gender distribution United States humanities Physicians Women Promotion (rank) Family medicine Emergency Medicine Humans Medicine Female Gender gap business Societies Medical health care economics and organizations media_common |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 61:540-549 |
| ISSN: | 0736-4679 |
| Popis: | Background Gender inequities in recognition, compensation, promotion, and leadership roles exist in emergency medicine. Formal recognition in the workplace and opportunities for advancement are vulnerable to bias. Objective To examine the gender distribution of national awards in emergency medicine, to analyze whether there is a gap, and to highlight notable trends. Methods Recipients of the major award categories between 2001 and 2020 were examined for the 3 main national emergency medicine organizations. The gender distribution of award winners by year was compared with the gender distribution of female faculty in emergency medicine departments using data from the Association of American Medical Colleges and a chi-squared analysis. Results The gender gap in award winners has decreased over time, but men are still disproportionately given national awards over women. In all 3 organizations, women represented a smaller proportion of award winners than men when compared with the national proportion of women in academic emergency medicine. Advocacy awards were the one category where women were more likely to be recognized. Women were notably least likely to receive clinical and leadership awards. Conclusions The gender gap in emergency medicine awards has narrowed in the last 20 years but still exists. This discrepancy is an example of how bias can compound over time to generate gaps in recognition, career advancement, and promotion. The pipeline to award nominations should be addressed at the individual, departmental, awards committee, and organizational levels. © 2021 Elsevier Inc. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect