A comparison of diagnostic performance of vacuum-assisted biopsy and core needle biopsy for breast microcalcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| Autor: | Xu Hua Hu, Chao Xi Zhou, Xiao Ran Wang, Gui Ying Wang, Shan Yang, Xu Chen Huang, Fei Fei Wang |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Image-Guided Biopsy medicine.medical_specialty Percutaneous Breast Neoplasms Cochrane Library 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Biopsy medicine Humans Aged medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Calcinosis General Medicine Middle Aged Ductal carcinoma Confidence interval 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Relative risk Meta-analysis Female Biopsy Large-Core Needle Radiology Microcalcification medicine.symptom business |
| Zdroj: | Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 187:999-1008 |
| ISSN: | 1863-4362 0021-1265 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11845-018-1781-6 |
| Popis: | Core needle biopsy (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) are both popularly used breast percutaneous biopsies. Both of them have become reliable alternatives to open surgical biopsy (OSB) for breast microcalcification (BM). It is controversial that which biopsy method is more accurate and safer for BM. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance between CNB and VAB for BM, aiming to find out the better method. Articles according with including and excluding criteria were collected from the databases, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Preset outcomes were abstracted and pooled to find out the potential advantages in CNB or VAB. Seven studies were identified and entered final meta-analysis from initially found 138 studies. The rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) underestimation was significantly lower in VAB than CNB group [risk ratio (RR) = 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40 to 2.40, p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink