Correlation of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Analysis to Surgical Measurements of the Tricuspid Valve Annular Diameter
Autor: | Himani V. Bhatt, Ahmed El-Eshmawi, Pritul R. Patel, John Spivack, David H. Adams, Yasmin Amir, Gregory W. Fischer |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Male
Accuracy and precision medicine.medical_treatment Diastole Echocardiography Three-Dimensional 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Standard deviation 03 medical and health sciences Intraoperative Period 0302 clinical medicine McNemar's test 030202 anesthesiology Medicine Humans Prospective Studies Cardiac Surgical Procedures Prospective cohort study Mitral regurgitation Tricuspid valve business.industry Mitral Valve Insufficiency Reproducibility of Results Middle Aged Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine medicine.anatomical_structure Heart valve repair Female Tricuspid Valve Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Nuclear medicine Echocardiography Transesophageal Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. 33(1) |
ISSN: | 1532-8422 |
Popis: | Objective This study sought to determine if 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography would more closely correspond to direct surgical measurements of the maximal tricuspid valve (TV) annular diameter than 2-dimensional (2D) measurements. Design Prospective study. Setting The cardiothoracic operating rooms (ORs) at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York, NY. Participants Fifty-nine patients over 18 years of age underwent elective mitral valve surgery for severe mitral regurgitation from 2014 to 2015. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Two-dimensional and 3D data sets and surgical TV annular dimensions were measured. Bland-Altman analysis was conducted and absolute differences were compared using paired t tests and the McNemar test. The observed mean difference between the 2D measurements by transgastric right ventricular diastolic view and the surgical measurements was 0.21 cm (standard deviation [SD] = 0.36 cm); the mean difference between the 3D measurements and surgical measures was -0.03 cm (SD = 0.19 cm). The McNemar test showed that the rate of highly successful measurements, defined as those within 0.2 cm of the true surgical score, using the 3D technique (66%) was significantly better than the rate of highly successful measurements using the 2D technique (25%), p Conclusion Three-dimensional imaging and measurement of the TV annular diameter is feasible in the OR setting. The superiority of the 3D measurements versus 2D measurements allows for greater precision and accuracy and may guide better intraoperative surgical decision-making. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |