Effect of the serotonin transporter gene and of environment on the continuity of anxiety and depression traits throughout adolescence

Autor: Roberto Giorda, Eric Griez, Valentina Bianchi, Dario Monzani, Maria Nobile, Monica Bellina, Andrea Greco, Ombretta Carlet, Giampaolo Perna, Pietro Colombo, Massimo Molteni
Přispěvatelé: Nobile M., Greco A., Perna G., Colombo P., Bianchi V., Bellina M., Giorda R., Monzani D., Carlet O., Griez E., Molteni M., Psychiatrie & Neuropsychologie, RS: MHeNs - R2 - Mental Health, Nobile, M, Greco, A, Perna, G, Colombo, P, Bianchi, V, Bellina, M, Giorda, R, Monzani, D, Carlet, O, Griez, E, Molteni, M
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2014
Předmět:
Zdroj: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 23(4), 399-409. Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 2045-7960
Popis: Aims.Many studies of various stress reactive phenotypes suggest that 5-HTTLPR short allele carriers (S-carriers) are characterised by the stable trait of negative affectivity that is converted to psychopathology only under conditions of stress. In this study, we examined the moderating role of the 5-HTTLPR on the relationship between two objective chronic risk factors, i.e. socioeconomic status (SES) and family structure, and internalising symptoms across adolescence.Methods.A multigroup path analysis was employed in a general adolescent population sample of a 5-year follow-up study.Results.Internalising problems were significantly more stable in theS-carriers. The focus on the main dimensions of internalising problems, i.e. anxiety and depression, revealed two different developmental patterns. In theS-carriers Anxiety problems seemed to be more stable and to predict a possible evolution towards the development of Depressive problems. In the long allele homozygotes (LL-subjects) the anxiety trait was significantly less stable, and, in late-adolescence, seemed to be significantly predicted by SES, suggesting a possible gene–environment interaction (G × E). Family structure seemed to play a role in a G × E perspective only until early-adolescence, while during late-adolescence SES seemed to play a pivotal role in interaction with 5-HTTLPR, with the S-allele playing a protective role.Conclusions.Future models of the developmental link between environmental adversities and internalising behaviour therefore need to consider that the effect of G × E interaction, may be associated with internalising behaviour via different mechanisms during different time frames and that shifts in the strength of this effect should be expected across development.
Databáze: OpenAIRE