Impact of education on APOL1 testing attitudes among prospective living kidney donors
Autor: | Tristan McIntosh, Deirdre Sawinski, S. Ali Husain, Heidi Walsh, Amber J. Li, James M. DuBois, Sumit Mohan, Melody S. Goodman, Ana S. Iltis, Jordan G. Nestor, Kristen L. King |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Gerontology
Transplantation Community engagement medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Context (language use) Apolipoprotein L1 Kidney Transplantation Article Immediate family Black or African American Attitude Donation Living Donors medicine Humans Genetic Testing Prospective Studies Organ donation Family history business Genetic testing Drawback |
Zdroj: | Clin Transplant |
ISSN: | 1399-0012 0902-0063 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ctr.14516 |
Popis: | It is unknown how providing prospective living donors with information about APOL1, including the benefits and drawbacks of testing, influences their desire for testing. In this study, we surveyed 102 participants with self-reported African ancestry and positive family history of kidney disease, recruited from our nephrology waiting room. We assessed views on APOL1 testing before and after presentation of a set of potential benefits and drawbacks of testing and quantified the self-reported level of influence individual benefits and drawbacks had on participants’ desire for testing in the proposed context of living donation. The majority of participants (92%) were aware of organ donation and more than half (56%) had considered living donation. And though we found no significant change in response following presentation of the potential benefits and the drawbacks of APOL1 testing by study end significance, across all participants, “becoming aware of the potential risk of kidney disease among your immediate family” was the benefit with the highest mean influence (3.3±1.4), while the drawback with the highest mean influence (2.9±1.5) was “some transplant centers may not allow you to donate to a loved one”. This study provides insights into the priorities of prospective living donors and suggests concern for how the information affects family members may strongly influence desires for testing. It also highlights the need for greater community engagement to gain a deeper understanding of the priorities that influence decision making on APOL1 testing. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |