Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of the Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, Selinexor, in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Subtypes
Autor: | Jatin P. Shah, Andre Goy, John Kuruvilla, Joost S.P. Vermaat, Eric Van Den Neste, Catherine Thieblemont, Sameer Bakhshi, Miguel Canales, Michael Kauffman, Sharon Shacham, Nagesh Kalakonda, Ulrich Jaeger, Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos, Krzysztof Warzocha, Marie Maerevoet, Kamal Chamoun, René-Olivier Casasnovas, Juan-Manuel Sancho, Fatima De la Cruz, Sylvain Choquet, Fritz Offner, Matthew Ku, Ronit Gurion, George A Follows, Josee M. Zijlstra, Miklos Egyed, Xiwen Ma, Federica Cavallo, Paolo Caimi, Brian T. Hill, Priyanka Samal, Michael W. Schuster, Nada Hamad |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | UCL - SSS/IREC/MIRO - Pôle d'imagerie moléculaire, radiothérapie et oncologie, UCL - (SLuc) Centre du cancer, UCL - (SLuc) Service de gastro-entérologie, UCL - (SLuc) Unité d'oncologie médicale |
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: |
Oncology
Adult Male Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Lymphoma DLBCL subtypes De novo and transformed DLBCL Salvage therapy Treatment response Internal medicine hemic and lymphatic diseases 80 and over Large B-Cell medicine Relapsed/refractory DLBCL XPO1 Aged Aged 80 and over Female Humans Hydrazines Lymphoma Large B-Cell Diffuse Middle Aged Treatment Outcome Triazoles Adverse effect Hematology business.industry Hazard ratio Germinal center medicine.disease Diffuse Tolerability business Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
Zdroj: | Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia r-IGTP. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Germans Trias i Pujol instname Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, Vol. 22, no.1, p. 24-33 (2022) Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia, 22(1), 24-33. CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP |
ISSN: | 2152-2650 |
Popis: | The phase 2b, open-label, multicenter SADAL study evaluated single agent oral selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after >= 2 lines of systemic therapy. Similar activity was observed in GCB- and non-GCB DLBCL with a trend to higher response rates in DLBCL transformed from follicular lymphoma. Lower response rates were observed in double expressor DLBCL; higher response rates were observed in patients with baseline hemoglobin >= 10 g/dL and normal levels of C-MYC or BCL-2 expression (51%). Overall, strong single agent activity with selinexor were observed in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.Background: The SADAL study evaluated oral selinexor in patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of the SADAL study by DLBCL subtype to determine the effects of DLBCL subtypes on efficacy and tolerability of selinexor. Patients and Methods: Data from 134 patients in SADAL were analyzed by DLBCL subtypes for overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of treatment response, progression-free survival, and adverse events rate. Results: ORR in the entire cohort was 29.1%, and similar in patients with germinal center (GCB) versus non-GCB DLBCL (31.7% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.45); transformed DLBCL showed a trend towards higher ORR than de novo DLBCL: 38.7% vs. 26.2% (P = 0.23). Despite similar prior treatment regimens and baseline characteristics, patients with DLBCL and normal C-MYC/BCL-2 protein expression levels had a significantly higher ORR (46.2% vs.14.8%, P = 0.012) and significantly longer OS (medians 13.7 vs. 5.1 months, hazard ratio 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23-0.77], P = 0.004) as compared with those whose DLBCL had C-MYC and BCL-2 overexpression. Among patients who had normal expression levels of either C-MYC or BCL-2 and baseline hemoglobin levels >= 10g/dL, ORR was 51.5% (n = 47), with median OS of 15.5 months and median PFS of 4.6 months. Similar rates of adverse events were noted in all subgroups. Conclusions: Overall, single agent oral selinexor showed strong responses in patients with limited treatment alternatives regardless of germinal center B-cell type or disease origin. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |