Performance and data interpretation of the in vivo comet assay in pharmaceutical industry: EFPIA survey results
Autor: | Ulla Plappert-Helbig, M.R. O'Donovan, Bas-jan van der Leede, Jonathan Howe, Ann T. Doherty, Véronique Thybaud, Melanie Guérard |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2014 |
Předmět: |
Micronucleus Tests
Drug Industry business.industry Data Collection Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis Comet Guidelines as Topic Rodentia Survey result Pharmacology medicine.disease_cause Europe Comet assay In vivo Toxicity Micronucleus test medicine Genetics Animals Comet Assay business Genotoxicity DNA Damage Pharmaceutical industry |
Zdroj: | Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. :81-88 |
ISSN: | 1383-5718 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.09.008 |
Popis: | In genotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals the rodent alkaline comet assay is being increasingly used as a second in vivo assay in addition to the in vivo micronucleus assay to mitigate in vitro positive results as recommended by the ICH S2(R1) guideline. This paper summarizes a survey suggested by the Safety Working Party of European Medicines Agency (EMA), and conducted by the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) to investigate the experience among European pharmaceutical companies by conducting the in vivo comet assay for regulatory purpose. A special focus was given on the typology of the obtained results and to identify potential difficulties encountered with the interpretation of study data. The participating companies reported a total of 147 studies (conducted in-house or outsourced) and shared the conclusion on the comet assay response for 136 studies. Most of the studies were negative (118/136). Only about 10% (14/136 studies) of the comet assays showed a positive response. None of the positive comet assay results were clearly associated with organ toxicity indicating that the positive responses are not due to cytotoxic effects of the compound in the tissue examined. The number of comet assays with an equivocal or inconclusive response was rare, respectively |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |