Leprosy perceptions and knowledge in endemic districts in India and Indonesia: Differences and commonalities
Autor: | Suchitra Lisam, Anna T. van ‘t Noordende, Vivek Kumar Singh, Atif Sadiq, Ida J. Korfage, Miftahol Arifin, Willem Herman van Brakel, Panca Ruthindartri |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Public Health |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Bacterial Diseases
Male Health Knowledge Attitudes Practice Social stigma Cross-sectional study RC955-962 Social Stigma Psychological intervention Social Sciences Cultural Anthropology Geographical Locations 0302 clinical medicine Medical Conditions Sociology Psychological Attitudes Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Psychology Public and Occupational Health 030212 general & internal medicine Medical Personnel Aged 80 and over Middle Aged Religion Professions Infectious Diseases Social Systems Health education Female Leprosy Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Behavioral and Social Aspects of Health Research Article Neglected Tropical Diseases Adult medicine.medical_specialty Asia Adolescent 030231 tropical medicine Oceania Stigma (botany) India Qualitative property 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being medicine Humans Aged Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Biology and Life Sciences medicine.disease Tropical Diseases Focus group Cross-Sectional Studies Indonesia Family medicine Anthropology People and Places Population Groupings Perception |
Zdroj: | PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases (print), 15(1):e0009031, 1-19. Public Library of Science PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 15, Iss 1, p e0009031 (2021) |
ISSN: | 1935-2735 |
Popis: | Background Understanding how knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding leprosy differ in endemic countries can help us develop targeted educational and behavioural change interventions. This study aimed to examine the differences and commonalities in and determinants of knowledge, attitudes, practices and fears regarding leprosy in endemic districts in India and Indonesia. Principle findings A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was used. Persons affected by leprosy, their close contacts, community members and health workers were included. Through interview-administered questionnaires we assessed knowledge, attitudes, practices and fears with the KAP measure, EMIC-CSS and SDS. In addition, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted. The quantitative data were analysed using stepwise multivariate regression. Determinants of knowledge and stigma that were examined included age, gender, participant type, education, occupation, knowing someone affected by leprosy and district. The qualitative data were analysed using open, inductive coding and content analysis. We administered questionnaires to 2344 participants (46% from India, 54% from Indonesia) as an interview. In addition, 110 participants were interviewed in-depth and 60 participants were included in focus group discussions. Knowledge levels were low in both countries: 88% of the participants in India and 90% of the participants in Indonesia had inadequate knowledge of leprosy. In both countries, cause, mode of transmission, early symptoms and contagiousness of leprosy was least known, and treatment and treatability of leprosy was best known. In both countries, health workers had the highest leprosy knowledge levels and community members the highest stigma levels (a mean score of up to 17.4 on the EMIC-CSS and 9.1 on the SDS). Data from the interviews indicated that people were afraid of being infected by leprosy. Local beliefs and misconceptions differed, for instance that leprosy is in the family for seven generations (Indonesia) or that leprosy is a result of karma (India). The determinants of leprosy knowledge and stigma explained 10–29% of the variability in level of knowledge and 3–10% of the variability in level of stigma. Conclusion Our findings show the importance of investigating the perceptions regarding leprosy prior to educational interventions in communities: even though knowledge levels were similar, local beliefs and misconceptions differed per setting. The potential determinants we included in our study explained very little of the variability in level of knowledge and stigma and should be explored further. Detailed knowledge of local knowledge gaps, beliefs and fears can help tailor health education to local circumstances. Author summary This study aimed to examine the differences and commonalities in and determinants of knowledge, attitudes, practices and fears regarding leprosy in endemic districts in India and Indonesia. Persons affected by leprosy, their close contacts, community members and health workers were included. We administered questionnaires (the KAP measure, EMIC-CSS and SDS) to 2344 participants. In addition, 110 participants were interviewed in-depth and 60 participants were included in focus group discussions. Knowledge levels were low. In both countries, cause, mode of transmission, early symptoms and contagiousness of leprosy was least known, and treatment and treatability of leprosy was best known. In both countries, health workers had the highest leprosy knowledge levels and community members the highest stigma levels. Data from the interviews indicated that people were afraid of being infected by leprosy. Local beliefs and misconceptions differed. The potential determinants we included in our study explained very little of the variability in level of knowledge and stigma and should be explored further. Our findings show the importance of investigating the perceptions regarding leprosy prior to educational interventions in communities: even though knowledge levels were similar, local beliefs and misconceptions differed per setting. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |