Characterizing and evaluating rival discourses of the ‘sustainable city’: Towards a politics of pragmatic adversarialism
Autor: | Steven Griggs, Stephen Hall, David Howarth, Natacha Seigneuret |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Division of Solid Mechanics, Lund University [Lund], Pacte, Laboratoire de sciences sociales (PACTE), Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble (IEPG)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
History
Sociology and Political Science Floating signifier Geography Planning and Development 0211 other engineering and technologies 0507 social and economic geography 02 engineering and technology Public administration Discourse Sustainable urbanism Political science 11. Sustainability Ecological modernization Localism Cities Urban politics ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS Vision [SHS.ARCHI]Humanities and Social Sciences/Architecture space management 05 social sciences 021107 urban & regional planning Environmental ethics Sustainable city Sustainability 13. Climate action 050703 geography Political ecology |
Zdroj: | Political Geography Political Geography, Elsevier, 2017, 59, pp.36-46. ⟨10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.02.007⟩ |
ISSN: | 0962-6298 |
Popis: | The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link. For many, shifting economic and social contexts have created the conditions for a radical reappraisal of the orthodox image of the ‘sustainable city’. However, in assessing such potentialities, there is insufficient knowledge about the way in which local actors construct, live out and are gripped by this signifier. This article responds to this deficit by exploring how key actors engaged in urban development actually interpret the challenges of the ‘sustainable city’. In part, using a Q-methodology study in Bristol and Grenoble, we discern and construct three distinctive discourses of the sustainable city, which we name progressive reformism, public localism, and moral stewardship. Our findings challenge previous critiques of sustainable urbanism. We observe no consistent support for mainstream conceptions of sustainable urban development, but neither do we find significant support for entrepreneurial or radical green localist discourses of the sustainable city. Instead, we identify a common indifference to the tenets of ecological modernization (and, by extension, entrepreneurialism), and a shared skepticism of local self-sufficiency. We thus argue that such discourses offer uncertain foundations upon which to construct new visions of the ‘sustainable city’. In our view, this is because of the transformation of the ‘sustainable city’ from a relatively fixed idea into a floating signifier, coupled with the practices of local practitioners as policy bricoleurs. We conclude that efforts to develop new visions of ‘sustainable cities’ are best served by fostering an agonistic ethos of ‘pragmatic adversarialism’ amongst strategic leaders and stakeholders, which foregrounds politics and the right to difference. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |