On the Juridical Relevance of the Phenomenological Notion of Person in Max Scheler and Edith Stein

Autor: Francesco Galofaro
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Artificial intelligence
semiotics of law
Responsibility
Subject (philosophy)
Community
Electronic personality
Socio-semiotics
Language and Linguistics
Phenomenology (philosophy)
Human rights
Semiotics
Sociology
Relation (history of concept)
collective experience
origin of law
0505 law
060201 languages & linguistics
Voluntary termination of pregnancy
Interpretative phenomenological analysis
person
Interpretation (philosophy)
05 social sciences
law
semiotics of law
person
origin of law
collective experience
community
society
mass
abortion
Socio-semiotics
Values
Community
Mass
Human rights
Exclusion
Responsibility
Voluntary termination of pregnancy
Artificial intelligence
Electronic personality
Exclusion
Values
06 humanities and the arts
Mass
abortion
Object (philosophy)
Epistemology
society
0602 languages and literature
050501 criminology
Philosophy of law
Law
Zdroj: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
ISSN: 1572-8722
0952-8059
Popis: The paper presents a semiotic interpretation of the phenomenological debate on the notion of person, focusing in particular on Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler, and Edith Stein. The semiotic interpretation lets us identify the categories that orient the debate: collective/individual and subject/object. As we will see, the phenomenological analysis of the relation between person and social units such as the community, the association, and the mass shows similarities to contemporary socio-semiotic models. The difference between community, association, and mass provides an explanation for the establishment of legal systems. The notion of person we inherit from phenomenology can also be useful in facing juridical problems raised by the use of non-human decision-makers such as machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence applications.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: