| Autor: |
Giorgio Cacciola, Fortunato Giustra, Francesco Bosco, Alessandro Aprato, Federico De Meo, Pietro Cavaliere, Daniele Vezza, Matteo Giachino, Luigi Sabatini, Alessandro Massè |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. |
| ISSN: |
1432-1068 |
| DOI: |
10.1007/s00590-023-03497-y |
| Popis: |
Background Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) has proved to be an effective technique in complicated stem removal in femoral aseptic loosening or periprosthetic fracture. Debate remains about its safety in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The primary aim of this study is to analyze the ETO reinfection and union rate in two-stage hip revision. Material and methods A systematic literature review was performed regarding all studies reporting ETO outcomes in the two-stage revision for hip PJI up to October 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. A literature search was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE/EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Quality assessment of the articles was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews. Patient demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected. Results This systematic review included and analyzed nine clinical studies with a total of 382 ETO PJI hips in two-stage revision. The overall ETO reinfection rate was 8.9% (34 hips), consistent with the reinfection rate after two-stage revision in patients without ETO. The overall ETO union rate was 94.8% (347 hips), comparable to the ETO union rate in non-septic patients. Compared between a group of patients with ETO PJI and a group of patients with non-PJI ETO, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, both septic and aseptic, and for postoperative HHS. Conclusion ETO proved to be a safe and effective procedure in PJI revisions. It may be a viable option in challenging femoral stem removal during the two-stage hip revision in PJI. Level of evidence IV. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink