Contriving an Opinion of Cause of Death in Autopsies

Autor:	Nadia M. Al-Kandary, Anu Sasidharan
Rok vydání:	2020
Předmět:	De facto Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis Subject (philosophy) Fraternity Toxicology Pathology and Forensic Medicine Law medicine Istanbul Protocol Mill medicine.symptom Set (psychology) Psychology Confusion Cause of death
Zdroj:	Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology.
ISSN:	0973-9130 0973-9122
DOI:	10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.11440
Popis:	Contriving an opinion of cause of death is something that requires a good expertise in the subject knowledgeand the right set of discriminative skills. The immediate and basic causes of death, circumstances surroundingthe death, and the investigation findings of police officers are all the necessary prerequisites to be gathered,before formulating an opinion. Decisions on the cause of death most often de facto will decide the mannerof death.A forensic pathologist can give causes of death in a logical sequential manner. Hume’s and Mill’s philosophyis something to be always borne in the mind of a forensic pathologist. Istanbul Protocol is the only literaturementioning as to how to opine an effect, with respect to the causes or circumstances that led to the effect.This can be extrapolated to have five different compartmentalised categories of opinions. Unless there iscertain uniformity in opining, the more are the chances of confusion among our fraternity and the judiciary
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::feeceab25694292ef62cd2049f0d9fd5 https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.11440 Zobrazit plný text záznamu