A meta-analysis of confocal laser endomicroscopy for the detection of neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus
Autor: | Yi-Quan Xiong, Qing Chen, Xue-shan Zhong, Shu-Juan Ma, Jun-Hua Zhou |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Hepatology business.industry Gastroenterology Subgroup analysis medicine.disease Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine.anatomical_structure 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Barrett's esophagus Meta-analysis Predictive value of tests Internal medicine medicine Adenocarcinoma 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Esophagus Differential diagnosis business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 31:1102-1110 |
ISSN: | 0815-9319 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.13267 |
Popis: | Background and aims Barrett's esophagus (BE) is considered the most important risk factor for development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a recently developed technique used to diagnose neoplasia in BE. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of CLE for diagnosis of neoplasia in BE. Methods We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies for all articles published up to June 27, 2015 in English. The quality of included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Per-patient and per-lesion pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results In total, 14 studies were included in the final analysis, covering 789 patients with 4047 lesions. Seven studies were included in the per-patient analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 89% (95% CI: 0.82-0.94) and 83% (95% CI: 0.78-0.86), respectively. Ten studies were included in the per-lesion analysis. Compared with the PP analysis, the corresponding pooled sensitivity declined to 77% (95% CI: 0.73-0.81) and specificity increased to 89% (95% CI: 0.87-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that probe-based CLE (pCLE) was superior to endoscope-based CLE (eCLE) in pooled specificity [91.4% (95% CI: 89.7-92.9) vs 86.1% (95% CI: 84.3-87.8)] and AUC for the sROC (0.885 vs 0.762). Conclusion Confocal laser endomicroscopy is a valid method to accurately differentiate neoplasms from non-neoplasms in BE. It can be applied to BE surveillance and early diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |