Гармония в процессах развития природы и общества: «безусловный» и «условный» аргументы
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
---|---|
Předmět: |
unconditional harmony
conditional harmony development of natural systems chronology periodization numerical simulation Fibonacci series informatics-cybernetic model of Mankind system ‘Fibonacci’ model of the archaeological epoch безусловная гармония условная гармония развитие природных систем хронология периодизация числовое моделирование ряд Фибоначчи информатико-кибернетическая модель системы Человечества «Фибоначчиева» модель археологической эпохи |
DOI: | 10.24411/2226-7271-2018-11021 |
Popis: | Гармонию в процессах эволюции природы и общества на некотором этапе такого развития предложено считать «безусловной», если аргументом такого утверждения является интерпретация соответствующего процесса на базе числового ряда со знаменателем «золотого сечения», и «условной», если аргументом выступает ряд Жирмунского-Кузьмина (со знаменателем е-e – «"е" в степени минус "е"»), элементы которого скоррелированы с каждым шестым членом ряда Фибоначчи – дискретного варианта ряда «золотого сечения». The issue of whether the processes of nature and society development are harmonious (to a greater or lesser degree) is very relevant both theoretically and practically (since in this case it could be the basis for a political and/or legal decision). The subject matter of our study is mathematical simulative pattern of concepts of ‘harmony’ and ‘harmoniousness’, the study of which we carried out using cybernetic, historical-genetic, problem and conceptual analysis. According to Heraclitus, "one whole harmony streamlined the entire Universe, that is, heaven and earth, and the entire Cosmos as a whole through a mixture of opposite principles." We analysed this concept and proposed to expand it. In accordance with the traditions of mathematical science and humanitarian ideas, the ‘harmonious’ process is considered to be a temporary one, the adjacent stages of which correlate to each other at the ‘golden section’ law. We propose to consider ‘unconditional’ harmony in the processes of the evolution of nature and society at some stage of such development if the argument of such a statement is the interpretation of the corresponding process based on a numerical series with the denominator of the ‘golden section.’ In turn, the harmony is ‘conditional’ if the argument is the Zhirmunsky-Kuzmin series (with the denominator “e-e”), the elements of which are correlated with every sixth member of the Fibonacci series as a discrete version of the ‘golden section.’ “Conditional” harmony is inherent in the system of inanimate nature both in chronology of the emergence of all its new hierarchical levels, and in the typical sizes of representatives of those last-mentioned. In the system of living nature, ‘conditional’ harmony manifests itself as a ‘heritage’ of previously inanimate nature, i.e. only in typical sizes of representatives of its levels. The history of its occurrence is more complicated: each triad of successively arising hierarchical tiers of the living is formed during the same time (about 1.01 billion years, not counting the current, incomplete triad). The duration of the occurrence of components within each triad is correlated according to the law of ‘conditional’ harmony. Finally, the evolutionary processes of the current triad of the formation of the hierarchical system of life on Earth, i.e. Starting from 541 million years, they are characterized by the manifestation of ‘unconditional’ harmony. ‘Unconditional’ one is inherent in social systems development in archaeological and historical epoch. We conclude that unconditional harmony, characteristic of social dynamics in the archaeological epoch, is truth criterion of computed solution. Thus, the conditionality of such harmony or the absence of appropriate observation is evidence either of the incompleteness of the body of interest development, or of the informational incompleteness of the sources selected for its study. The conditionality of such harmony or the absence of appropriate observation is evidence either of the incompleteness of the development process of the object being studied, or of the informational incompleteness of the sources selected for its study. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |