2 hour versus 4 hours action line on WHO modified partograph
| Autor: | Seema Sharma, Anju Vij, Vinay Kumar, Rupika, Amit Gupta, Vikrant |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 4:205-207 |
| ISSN: | 2522-6622 2522-6614 |
| DOI: | 10.33545/gynae.2020.v4.i5d.703 |
| Popis: | Background: World health organization has promoted modified partograph with action line, 4 hours to left of alert line. While others have used various action line 2, 3, or 4 hours to initiate and guide ‘‘active management’’ decisions. Objectives of the study were to evaluate outcome of labour in terms of action line crossed and augmentation of labour and in whom labour has been managed with 4-hour vs 2-hour action line on WHO modified partograph. Methods: Every 8th primigravida mother fulfilling the inclusion criteria was enrolled for the study alternatively for 2 hourly and 4 hourly partogram reading. Results were compared between Group A, with 100 cases, in whom labour has been managed with WHO modified Partograph with 4-hour action line and Group B, with 100 cases, in whom labour has been managed with that of 2-hour action line. Results: The present study shows that more women in 2-hour arm crossed the action line, compared with the 4-hour arm, and therefore received more interventions to augment labour. Rate of caesarean section was more in group B than in group A (9%) which is statistically nonsignificant. Conclusions: Neonatal outcome measured with APGAR score at 5 minutes, has shown no significant difference in both groups. Therefore, partograph with 2-hour action line did not show any superiority over that of 4-hour action line but to be associated with higher incidence of intervention. Further research is required in this field of active management. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|