Exploring conversation analysis as an assessment tool for aphasia: the issue of reliability
| Autor: | David Walshaw, Lisa Perkins, Jenni Crisp |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1999 |
| Předmět: |
Linguistics and Language
Natural interaction Standardization media_common.quotation_subject Contrast (statistics) LPN and LVN Language and Linguistics Developmental psychology Variation (linguistics) Conversation analysis Neurology Otorhinolaryngology Aphasia Developmental and Educational Psychology medicine Conversation Neurology (clinical) medicine.symptom Psychology Reliability (statistics) Cognitive psychology media_common |
| Zdroj: | Aphasiology. 13:259-281 |
| ISSN: | 1464-5041 0268-7038 |
| Popis: | This paper describes an investigation of the temporal reliability of analyses of collaborative repair in aphasic conversation. Whilst it has been proposed that conversation analysis has a useful contribution to make to the assessment of aphasia, assessment methods which use natural interaction as a basis for analysis have been assumed to lack reliability because of variability in conversation in contrast to the standardization across assessments possible with formal assessments. This issue was addressed through comparison of quantitative and qualitative analyses of collaborative repair in dyadic conversations recorded on four different occasions between eight people with aphasia and their relatives. Quantitative results revealed significant within-participant variation in the quantity of collaborative repair occurring in the conversations but between-participant variation was of much greater magnitude. The findings of the qualitative analysis indicated reliability in the interactional challenges experienc... |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|