Association of cfDNA androgen receptor amplifications with BRAF alterations in mCRPC

Autor: Emma M. Ernst, Oliver Sartor, Patrick Cotogno, Brian E. Lewis, Joshua Schiff, Elisa Ledet, Charlotte Manogue
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 35:234-234
ISSN: 1527-7755
0732-183X
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.234
Popis: 234 Background: Cell free DNA (cfDNA) present in plasma of cancer pts can reflect tumoral alterations. Genomic alterations in cfDNA alter prognosis and abiraterone/enzalutamide resistance in mCRPC. The goal of this evaluation was to characterize AR amplifications (Amps) and various somatic point mutations (Muts) detected in mCRPC cfDNA and to relate those changes to other common alterations in the cfDNA landscape. Methods: A heterogenous group of 46 mCRPC patients (pts) with evidence of clinical progression from Tulane Cancer Center underwent cfDNA analysis using Guardant360 test (Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA). This evaluation included full exonic coverage of 70 genes and amplifications in 18 genes. Mutations reported herein include both known pathogenic mutations as well as mutations uncharacterized for functional importance. Results: 69.5% (n = 32) of the mCRPC pts evaluated had an AR alteration. Of the pts with AR alterations, 46.8% (n = 16) had AR Amps, 43.7% (n = 14) had AR Muts, and only 6.25% (n = 2) had both. In this cohort, AR alterations were the most commonly observed aberration. In addition to amplifications, 12 different AR Muts were detected. AR Muts included: T878A (n = 9), H875Y (n = 5), W742C (n = 4), AR L702H (n = 3), and others. To better understand the relationship between AR alteration and other commonly detected cfDNA aberrations, association between BRAF (35.5%), TP53 (46.7%), and MYC (22.2%) alterations and AR were assessed. Among these genes, TP53 alterations were all Muts and MYC alterations were all Amps. BRAF alterations were predominantly Amps (N = 15) though Muts were also detected (N = 6). Neither TP53 Muts or MYC Amps were significantly associated with AR alterations. On the other hand, BRAF alterations were significantly associated with AR Amps (p = 0.041); 60% (9/15) pts with AR Amps also had BRAF alteration (Odds ratio = 7.71, 95% CI 1.284- 46.366). Conclusions: AR alterations in cfDNA impact both disease progression and response to therapy. Co-segregation of AR and BRAF alterations may have significant prognostic and therapeutic implications. Further research and larger sample size is needed to further elucidate associations between the common somatic alterations detected in mCRPC.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: