Expert views on innovation and bureaucratization of science: Semantic network analysis of discourses on scientific governance
| Autor: | Leo Kim, Deok-Ho Jang |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Government
Public Administration business.industry Field (Bourdieu) Corporate governance media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Geography Planning and Development 050801 communication & media studies Management Monitoring Policy and Law Public relations 050905 science studies Creativity Deliberation 0508 media and communications Political science Science policy Bureaucracy 0509 other social sciences Human resources business media_common |
| Zdroj: | Science and Public Policy. 45:36-44 |
| ISSN: | 1471-5430 0302-3427 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/scipol/scx035 |
| Popis: | This article analyzes and compares expert groups’ (science policy experts and field researchers in engineering) perceptions of the national scientific agenda in South Korea. The national agenda seeks to identify the conditions necessary for creativity and innovation. In general, policy experts and field academics share a common notion that investment in human resources and increased interdisciplinary cooperation are prerequisites for global technological competence. However, comparison of semantic network analysis results reveals that policy officials and field scientists differ in their views of how the field of innovation, the academy and laboratory, should be governed and reformed. The analysis implies that more fundamental conditions need to be discussed in scientific governance, especially recognizing the importance of educational reform, encouraging collaborative culture in the academy and empowering a coordinative body in the government. However, these are yet to be included in the public deliberation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|