Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR

Autor:	Se-Fong Hung, S.L. Hong, Chi-chiu Lee, C.M. Chiu, Patrick W. L. Leung, Wai-sum Liu, Chun-pan Tang, T. P. Ho, Shi-leung Kwong
Rok vydání:	2006
Předmět:	Predictive validity medicine.medical_specialty Psychometrics CBCL Test validity medicine.disease behavioral disciplines and activities Test (assessment) Psychiatry and Mental health mental disorders Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Developmental and Educational Psychology medicine Criterion validity Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Psychology Psychiatry Reliability (statistics)
Zdroj:	Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 47:970-973
ISSN:	1469-7610 0021-9630
DOI:	10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x
Popis:	Background: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR were understudied. This study aimed at examining their test–retest reliability and criterion validity. Methods: Three Chinese community and clinic samples were recruited in Hong Kong. The parents, teachers, and youths respectively completed the CBCL, TRF, and YSR. Results: The Chinese CBCL, TRF, and YSR were test–retest reliable and valid. However, there was score/case attenuation at retest. CBCL and TRF appeared to screen externalizing and ADHD problems better, while YSR screened internalizing problems better. Conclusions: Clinicians should be cautious about score/case attenuation at retest while using CBCL, TRF, and YSR to chart patients’ progress. They should also recognize their different strengths in screening various disorders.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f6df5cdcd74075db8e2d59645ea3aa04 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.