Detrimental externalities, pollution rights, and the 'Coase theorem'
Autor: | Guoqiang Tian, John S. Chipman |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2011 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Economic Theory. 49:309-327 |
ISSN: | 1432-0479 0938-2259 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00199-011-0602-1 |
Popis: | This paper, which builds on Chipman (The economist’s vision. Essays in modern economic perspectives, 131–162, 1998), analyzes a simple model formulated by Hurwicz (Japan World Economics 7:49–74, 1995) of two agents—a polluter and a pollutee—and two commodities: “money” (standing for an exchangeable private good desired by both agents) and “pollution” (a public commodity desired by the polluter but undesired by the pollutee). There is also a government which issues legal rights to the two agents to emit a certain amount of pollution, which can be bought and sold with money. It is assumed that both agents act as price-takers in the market for pollution rights, so that competitive equilibrium is possible. The “Coase theorem” (so-called by Stigler (The theory of price, 1966) asserts that the equilibrium amount of pollution is independent of the allocation of pollution rights. A sufficient condition for this was (in another context) obtained by Edgeworth (Giorn Economics 2:233–245, 1891), namely that preferences of the two agents be “parallel” in the money commodity, whose marginal utility is constant. Hurwicz (Japan World Economics 7:49–74, 1995) argued that this parallelism is also necessary. This paper, which provides an exposition of the problem, raises some questions about this result, and provides an alternative necessary and sufficient condition. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |