The Conceptual Problems Arising from Legal Pluralism

Autor:	Jorge Luis Fabra-Zamora
Rok vydání:	2022
Předmět:	Sociology and Political Science Law
Zdroj:	Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société. 37:155-175
ISSN:	1911-0227 0829-3201
DOI:	10.1017/cls.2021.39
Popis:	This paper argues that analytical jurisprudence has been insufficiently attentive to three significant puzzles highlighted by the legal pluralist tradition: the existence of commonalities between different types of law, the possibility of a distinction between law and non-law, and the explanatory centrality of the state. I further argue that the resolution of these questions sets the stage for a renewed agenda of analytical jurisprudence and has to be considered in attempts for reconciliation between the academic traditions of analytical jurisprudence and legal pluralism, often called “pluralist jurisprudence.” I also argue that the resolution of these problems affects the empirical, doctrinal, and politico-moral inquiries about legal pluralism.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f63f00dfd70112a0f77416a6cc259c1f https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.39 Zobrazit plný text záznamu