Clinical Outcomes and the Impact of Oral Anticoagulants Prior to Diagnosis of COVID-19 on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Admitted to Hospitals in the UK – a Multicentre Observational Study

Autor: L. Roberts, Christina Crossette-Thambiah, Indika Rajakaruna, Sarah Lewis, Tamara Everington, Ceri Lynch, D. Sutton, P. Raheja, C. Allan, P. Mounter, Deepa R. J. Arachchillage, Laffan, Renu Riat, R. Oakes, S. Essex, Gillian C. Lowe, Z. Odho, Mari Frances Kilner, A. Langridge, N. Aung, A. Delaney, Anja B Drebes, Susie Shapiro, Richard Szydlo, Raza Alikhan, Phillip L R Nicolson, Tina Dutt, M. Makris, Z. Sayer, C. Lentaigne
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: SSRN Electronic Journal.
ISSN: 1556-5068
Popis: Coagulation dysfunction and thrombosis are major complications in patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Patients on oral anticoagulants prior to diagnosis of COVID-19 may therefore have better outcomes. We aimed: To first document the frequency of thrombosis, major bleeding and multiorgan failure (MOF) in patients admitted with COVID-19 and the contribution of these complications to 90-day mortality. To then determine the effects of oral anticoagulation, use prior to admission on the same outcomes as well as the requirement for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, when compared to a propensity matched cohort of patients not taking oral anticoagulants prior to admission. Methods: This was a multicentre observational cohort including adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to 26 UK hospitals between 1st of April 2020 and 31 July 2020. Findings: A total of 5883 patients were included in the study. Overall mortality was 29.2%. Incidences of thrombosis, major bleeding and MOF were 5.4%,1.7% and 3.3% respectively. The presence of thrombosis, major bleeding, or MOF were associated with a 1.8, 4.5 or 5.9-fold increased risk of dying, respectively. Of the 5883 patients studied, 83.6% (n= 4920) were not on oral anticoagulants (OAC) and 16.4% (n=963) were taking OAC at the time of admission. There was no difference in mortality between patients on OAC vs no OAC prior to admission when compared in an adjusted multivariate analysis (HR 1.05 (95%CI 0.93-1.19) P=0.15) or in an adjusted propensity score analysis (HR 0.92 (95%CI 0.58-1.450, P=0.18). In multivariate and adjusted propensity score analyses, the only significant association of no anticoagulants prior to admission was treatment in ICU (HR 1.98 [95%CI 1.37-2.85]). Interpretation: Thrombosis, major bleeding, and MOF were associated with higher mortality. Our results indicate that patients may continue to benefit from OAC after admission, especially reduced admission to ICU, without any increase in bleeding. Funding: Bayer plc supported the study by providing the investigator-initiated funding (P87339) to setup the multicentre database of the study. Declaration of Interest: DJA received funding from Bayer plc to setup the multicentre database of the study as an investigator-initiated funding and received research grant from Leo Pharma. ML received consultation and speaker fees from Astra-Zeneca, Sobi, Leo-Pharma, Takeda and Pfizer. PN received research grants from Novartis, Principia and Rigel, unrestricted grants from Sanofi, Chugai and Octapharma and honoraria from Bayer. RA received fees from Alexion, Bayer, BMS, Pfizer and Portola. SS has received meeting sponsorship, speaker fees and/or consultancy from Bayer, Pfizer, NovoNordisk, Sobi, Chugai/Roche and Shire/Takeda. SS receives funding support from the Medical Research Council (MR/T024054/1). The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). SL has received speaker fees from Bayer, BMS and Pfizer. Others have no conflict of interests to declare. Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA), Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) and received local Caldicott Guardian support in Scotland (reference number: 20/HRA/1785). Data was collected both retrospectively and prospectively from patient clinical records by the treating medical team with no breach of privacy or anonymity by allocating a unique study number with no direct patient identifiable data; therefore, consent was waived by the HRA.
Databáze: OpenAIRE