Rejoinder to William Lane Craig
| Autor: | David B. Myers |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2003 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Religious Studies. 39:427-430 |
| ISSN: | 1469-901X 0034-4125 |
| Popis: | While I may have misunderstood certain points in Craig's Molinist theodicy, a careful reading of my article will show that Craig is incorrect in his claim that I have failed to evaluate his proposal on the basis of its asserted standard: plausibility. The heart of my argument is that Craig's theodicy is implausible because it fails to provide a credible explanation of the culpability of all non-believers. In this rejoinder I try to show (1) why an evidentialist exoneration of reflective disbelievers (in Christ) also applies, contra Craig, to the unevangelized; and (2) that an evidentialist account of reflective disbelief is more plausible than Craig's sinful-resistance account. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|