ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Plexopathy: 2021 Update
| Autor: | Lubdha M Shah, Marc Appel, Vincent M Timpone, Daniel J. Boulter, Judah Burns, Daniel E Wessell, Troy A Hutchins, Francesca D Beaman, Matthew S Parsons, Leon Lenchik, Toshio Moritani, Vikas Agarwal, Amanda S. Corey, Expert Panel on Neurological, Musculoskeletal Imaging, Khoi D Than, Simranjit X. Singh, A Orlando Ortiz, A Tuba Kendi, Majid A Khan, David S Liebeskind, Joici Job, Vinil N Shah |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Brachial Plexus Neuritis
medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Context (language use) medicine.disease Appropriate Use Criteria Plexopathy Lumbosacral plexus medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Brachial Plexopathy Intensive care medicine business Brachial plexus Medical literature |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American College of Radiology. 18:S423-S441 |
| ISSN: | 1546-1440 |
| Popis: | Plexopathy may be caused by diverse pathologies, including trauma, nerve entrapment, neoplasm, inflammation, infection, autoimmune disease, hereditary disease, and idiopathic etiologies. For patients presenting with brachial or lumbosacral plexopathy, dedicated plexus MRI is the most appropriate initial imaging modality for all clinical scenarios and can identify processes both intrinsic and extrinsic to the nerves. Other imaging tests may be appropriate for initial imaging depending on the clinical scenario. This document addresses initial imaging strategies for brachial and lumbosacral plexopathy in the following clinical situations: nontraumatic plexopathy with no known malignancy, traumatic plexopathy (not perinatal), and plexopathy occurring in the context of a known malignancy or posttreatment syndrome. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|