How Did You Like This Course? The Advantages and Limitations of Reaction Criteria in Ethics Education
| Autor: | Brett S. Torrence, Michael D. Mumford, Logan M. Steele, Tyler J. Mulhearn, E. Michelle Todd, Logan L. Watts, Megan R. Turner, Shane Connelly |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Social Psychology
education 05 social sciences Applied psychology Training evaluation Sample (statistics) 06 humanities and the arts Moral reasoning 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Course satisfaction 0502 economics and business Ethics education Relevance (information retrieval) 060301 applied ethics Psychology Social psychology 050203 business & management General Psychology |
| Zdroj: | Ethics & Behavior. 28:483-496 |
| ISSN: | 1532-7019 1050-8422 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10508422.2017.1308193 |
| Popis: | Ethics courses are most commonly evaluated using reaction measures. However, little is known about the specific types of reaction data being collected (e.g., content relevance, course satisfaction) and how these reaction data relate to improvements in trainee performance (e.g., knowledge, moral reasoning). Using a sample of 381 ethics training sessions, major reaction data categories were identified. Content and course satisfaction were the most frequently collected types of reaction criteria. Furthermore, content relevance (r = .84) and course satisfaction (r = .79) showed strong, positive relationships with performance criteria, whereas content satisfaction demonstrated a moderate, negative relationship (r = –.28). These results and future directions for ethics training evaluation are discussed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|