Conversation and common ground

Autor: Mitchell S. Green
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Zdroj: Philosophical Studies. 174:1587-1604
ISSN: 1573-0883
0031-8116
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0779-z
Popis: Stalnaker’s conception of context as common ground (what he calls CG-context) possesses unquestionable explanatory power, shedding light on presupposition, presupposition accommodation, the behavior of certain types of conditionals, epistemic modals, and related phenomena. The CG-context approach is also highly abstract, so merely pointing out that it fails to account for an aspect of communication is an inconclusive criticism. Instead our question should be whether it can be extended or modified to account for such a phenomenon while preserving its spirit. To that end, this essay assesses the prospects of the CG-context approach for making sense of the variety of ways in which interlocutors accept propositions as well as non-propositional contents, some different types of conversation and the norms distinctive of these different types, some pre-illocutionary pragmatic phenomena, conversational injustice, and fictional discourse.
Databáze: OpenAIRE