The Allure and impossibility of an algorithmic future: a lesson from Patočka’s supercivilisation
| Autor: | Ľubica Učník |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
05 social sciences
Foundation (evidence) 050109 social psychology Formal reasoning 0506 political science Epistemology Philosophy Argument 050602 political science & public administration 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Political philosophy Impossibility Law History general Social Sciences (miscellaneous) |
| Zdroj: | Studies in East European Thought. 73:249-270 |
| ISSN: | 1573-0948 0925-9392 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11212-020-09394-y |
| Popis: | Our experience of the present is defined by numbers, graphs and, increasingly, an algorithmically calculated future, based on the mathematical and formal reasoning that began with the rise of modern science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Today, this reasoning is further modified and extended in the form of computer-executed, algorithmic reasoning. Instead of fallible human reasoning, algorithms—based on mining databases for ‘information’—are seen to provide more efficient processes, offering fast solutions. In this paper, then, I will follow Jan Patocka, who suggests that we live in an age of supercivilisation, one in which human reasoning has become self-sufficient, ceasing to depend on the supernatural or cultural traditions that previously guided human lives. My argument is that Patocka’s analysis of supercivilisation can open up a different way to reflect on the ‘spiritual foundation of our times’. As Patocka says, to reflect on our situation does not mean that we can change it, but reflection can give us a new understanding that will open up different ways to think about our human future. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |