| Popis: |
Soil management is known to have significant effects on soil structure. Especially, grassland renovation and associated ploughing may have destructive influence on structure, but on the other hand conversion of arable land to grassland can improve pore structure and soil functions. In crop rotations including perennial grasses, soil structure is affected by these counteracting processes. The purpose of this work was to study and quantify the impacts of varying soil management practices on the structure of boreal arable heavy clay soils. We studied intact topsoil samples collected from two sites by X-ray computed microtomography, image analysis, image-based pore-scale flow simulations, and water retention measurements. At both sites, one area under long-term (at least 30-year-old) grassland was compared with adjacent field area with contrasting managements:Site 1: Cereal production under no-till management for 13 years prior to sampling. Site 2: Crop rotation of a livestock farm with cereals and perennial grasses, tillage by ploughing. At the sampling time this field area had been two years under grass after preceding 3-year cereal period. Both imaging and water retention showed statistically and practically significant differences in the soil macropore structure at site 1 such that porosity of the long-term grassland was clearly higher that that under cereal production. On the contrary, at site 2, only minor differences between managements were observed. Our results show that the soil management practices affect the macropore structure of boreal arable clay soil and that no-till and crop-rotation managements had clearly different effects on soil structure as compared to long-term grasslands. |
