An Instrument to Capture the Phenomenology of Implantable Brain Device Use
Autor: | Eran Klein, Frederic Gilbert, Ishan Dasgupta, Timothy Scott Brown, Sara Goering, H Martens |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Deep brain stimulation Health Policy media_common.quotation_subject medicine.medical_treatment Neuropsychology 06 humanities and the arts 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Phenomenology (philosophy) 03 medical and health sciences Psychiatry and Mental health 0302 clinical medicine Physical medicine and rehabilitation Neurology Feeling medicine 060301 applied ethics Neurosurgery Psychology Neuroethics 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Maladaptation Brain–computer interface media_common |
Zdroj: | Neuroethics. 14:333-340 |
ISSN: | 1874-5504 1874-5490 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12152-019-09422-7 |
Popis: | One important concern regarding implantable Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) is the fear that the intervention will negatively change a patient’s sense of identity or agency. In particular, there is concern that the user will be psychologically worse-off following treat20 ment despite postoperative functional improvements. Clinical observations from similar implantable brain technologies, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), show a small but significant proportion of patients report feelings of strangeness or difficulty adjusting to a new concept of themselves characterized by a maladaptive je ne sais quoi despite clear motor improvement. Despite the growing number of cases in the DBS literature, there is currently no accepted or standardized tool in neuroethics specifically designed to capture the phenomenological postoperative experience of patients implanted with DBS or BCI devices. Given potential risks of postoperative maladaptation, it is important for the field of neuroethics to develop a qualitative instrument that can serve as a shared method for capturing postoperative variations in patient experience of identity and agency. The goal of this article is to introduce an instrument we have developed for this purpose and call for further neuroethical efforts to assess the phenomenology of implantable brain device use. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |