LAPAROSCOPIC VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR
Autor: | Muhammad Adeel Kaiser, Uzma Intisar, Qaim Deen, Amna Mazhar, Qasim Farooq |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | The Professional Medical Journal. 25:594-598 |
ISSN: | 2071-7733 1024-8919 |
DOI: | 10.29309/tpmj/2018.25.04.353 |
Popis: | Introduction: The common practice in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR)is to place a dual mesh to prevent visceral adhesions, as majority of the patients are not ableto afford the expense of these meshes. We use prolene mesh to repair hernia. Objectives: Theaim of this study was to determine the frequency of success of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair(LVHR) using omentum as a barrier in patients presenting with ventral hernia. Study Design:Descriptive case series. Setting: Surgical Unit 3, Services Hospital Lahore, Pakistan. Period:6 months duration from 16th of July 2015 to 15st January 2016. Methods: 60 patients wereselected fulfilling the criteria from Department of General Surgery. 10mm telescope angled at 30degree was employed. Hernial contents were reduced but the peritoneal sac was left as such.The prolene mesh was inserted into the abdominal cavity through a port of 10mm diameterand fixed. Omentum was then sandwiched between abdominal wall and viscera. Patients werefollowed-up in OPD for 12 months. Results: Majority of the patients were females (56.7%) withthe mean age of 46.40 years and mean weight of 68 kg. The patients were averagely foundobese with a mean BMI of 25.40kg/m2. Majority of the patients (n=50, 83.3%) had success inhernia repair. Stratification of patients by age, gender and BMI showed (p-value was >0.05 in all3 cases) statistically insignificant difference between various subgroups. Conclusion: LVHR is auseful technique and simple proline mesh with omental barrier is a safe and low-cost alternativeto dual mesh technique. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |