An Appeal for Autonomy, Access, and Accountability in Family Court Reform Efforts

Autor:	Nancy Ver Steegh, Gabrielle Davis, Loretta Frederick
Rok vydání:	2014
Předmět:	Law Accountability Appeal ComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTING Confidentiality Dispute mechanism Business Alternative dispute resolution Dispute resolution Legal advice Dispute board
Zdroj:	Family Court Review. 52:655-661
ISSN:	1531-2445
DOI:	10.1111/fcre.12117
Popis:	An array of dispute resolution alternatives should be available to families who elect to use them. We suggest a system where parties maintain unhindered access to traditional courts but are able to knowingly and voluntarily opt into dispute resolution processes that are delivered in a fair, affordable, and accountable manner. We support provision of community-based and private-sector services to the extent that court funding and access is not diminished. Key Points for the Family Court Community:  Choices about participation in dispute resolution processes should be party driven.  Parties should receive complete and accurate information about available dispute resolution processes and have access to confidential legal advice.  Dispute resolution processes should be fair, affordable, competently provided, and accountable.  Parties should have open access to traditional court processes.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::eb2a5a1bbe8d29a12c3429de6aeafad4 https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12117 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.